J. S. Bell’s well-known proofs of inequalities (and related work) are shown to be invalidated by two counter-arguments (-examples) that are based on Einstein-local propositions: Bell-type inequalities of Einstein-Pod...J. S. Bell’s well-known proofs of inequalities (and related work) are shown to be invalidated by two counter-arguments (-examples) that are based on Einstein-local propositions: Bell-type inequalities of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiments must include, as virtually all physical theories do, elements of physical reality and their mathematical representations that relate to continua as opposed to exclusively finite numbers. Furthermore, Bell-type inequalities must be valid for all possible experimental geometries that lead to the quantum result. Based on these propositions, violations of Bell-type inequalities are demonstrated without violating Einstein locality, without conspiracy type theories and even for the case that all known “loopholes” are closed.展开更多
Based on “locality” considerations, John Stuart Bell and his followers have derived inequalities and theorems that, when taken together with actual experiments that have been performed by Aspect and others, appear t...Based on “locality” considerations, John Stuart Bell and his followers have derived inequalities and theorems that, when taken together with actual experiments that have been performed by Aspect and others, appear to contradict physical reality as defined by Einstein. However, their specifically applied concept of locality is in conflict with the Fundamental Model of probability theory and the set theoretic definition of conditional probabilities. Bell-type inequalities are, therefore, not adequate to decide ponderous questions regarding physical reality.展开更多
文摘J. S. Bell’s well-known proofs of inequalities (and related work) are shown to be invalidated by two counter-arguments (-examples) that are based on Einstein-local propositions: Bell-type inequalities of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiments must include, as virtually all physical theories do, elements of physical reality and their mathematical representations that relate to continua as opposed to exclusively finite numbers. Furthermore, Bell-type inequalities must be valid for all possible experimental geometries that lead to the quantum result. Based on these propositions, violations of Bell-type inequalities are demonstrated without violating Einstein locality, without conspiracy type theories and even for the case that all known “loopholes” are closed.
文摘Based on “locality” considerations, John Stuart Bell and his followers have derived inequalities and theorems that, when taken together with actual experiments that have been performed by Aspect and others, appear to contradict physical reality as defined by Einstein. However, their specifically applied concept of locality is in conflict with the Fundamental Model of probability theory and the set theoretic definition of conditional probabilities. Bell-type inequalities are, therefore, not adequate to decide ponderous questions regarding physical reality.
