Background Frailty is a major determinant of outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease(CAD)undergoing lower limb amputation.This study evaluates the impact of frailty on in-hospital outcomes in these patients....Background Frailty is a major determinant of outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease(CAD)undergoing lower limb amputation.This study evaluates the impact of frailty on in-hospital outcomes in these patients.Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample(2016–2021)to identify adult patients with CAD who underwent lower limb amputation.Frailty was defined using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups(ACG)frailty indicator.Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the independent association of frailty with in-hospital outcomes,and propensity score matching(PSM)was performed to further account for confounding factors.Results After PSM,9,990 patients were included in each cohort.Frail patients experienced higher rates of in-hospital mortality(3.9%vs.1.5%,P<0.001),acute limb ischemia(3.8%vs.3.1%,P=0.015),fasciotomy(2.1%vs.1.4%,P<0.001),stump infection(7.9%vs.6.6%,P<0.001),cardiogenic shock(0.9%vs.0.7%,P=0.032),sudden cardiac arrest(2.7%vs.2.1%,P=0.004),mechanical circulatory support(0.3%vs.0.2%,P=0.028),major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events(7.7%vs.5.4%,P<0.001),and sepsis(18.3%vs.13.8%,P<0.001).In multivariable logistic regression analysis,frailty remained an independent predictor of inhospital mortality and major complications.Conclusion Frailty is independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality and adverse events among CAD patients undergoing lower limb amputation.Incorporating frailty assessment into preoperative evaluation may improve risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making in this high-risk population.展开更多
Rehabilitation of lower limb amputation in developing countries is quite challenging.Though there are basic to highly advanced prostheses available in India,the set-up is still facing difficulties in developing countr...Rehabilitation of lower limb amputation in developing countries is quite challenging.Though there are basic to highly advanced prostheses available in India,the set-up is still facing difficulties in developing countries.Prosthetic management is difficult due to lack of availability of prostheses and reduced affordability among low income populations.In this review we highlighted the lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation status in India.Currently,India is advancing well in the rehabilitation field,but further studies are required to provide more evidence and recommendation.展开更多
Peripheral vascular disease is the main reason for lower limb amputation, mostly present in old persons. The number of lower limb amputations due to cancer is small, but affects all age groups. Surgery is the primary ...Peripheral vascular disease is the main reason for lower limb amputation, mostly present in old persons. The number of lower limb amputations due to cancer is small, but affects all age groups. Surgery is the primary （main） treatment for most bone tumors, the main goal is to remove all of the tumor. Sometimes limb amputation is the only possible solution, resulting in severe impairment of body function and activity limitations. The final goal of rehabilitation is to enable patients to re-integrate to the highest possible level into their previous social life and work. The article presents the functional outcome of patients with lower limb amputation due to oncological disease--cancer of bone or soft tissue admitted for rehabilitation to the University Rehabilitation Institute So^a in the period from 2002 to 2012. During this period 67 amputees were admitted and 60 of them were fitted with appropriate lower limb prosthesis. Younger age and transtibial level of amputation were of better functional outcome than in transfemoral or hip disarticulation amputees.展开更多
Background: Confusion often arises in caring for diabetic foot infections and ulcers, especially with antimicrobials;we aim to shed light on this entity and alert healthcare workers to its stewardship. Methods: Record...Background: Confusion often arises in caring for diabetic foot infections and ulcers, especially with antimicrobials;we aim to shed light on this entity and alert healthcare workers to its stewardship. Methods: Records were reviewed between February 2016 and September 2023. Data for patients diagnosed with diabetes and foot ulcers, infected or not, were examined following ICD 9 search terms. Records for patients were included if they were prediabetic/diabetic adults with foot ulcers, more than 18 years old, and on antidiabetic treatment. Patients were excluded if they insulin resistant, with normal HgbA1c levels, wheel-chair dependent, bed-bound, non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients who had vascular lower limb surgery earlier to ulcers, diabetic patients who had aortocoronary bypass, deep venous thrombosis within six months, malignancy, and severe clinical depression. A modified IWGDF/IDSA guidelines definitions for DFI and DFU was considered. Statistical analysis was done using R programming. Statistical methods were employed as appropriate, and a significant P-value was considered for P Results: Most characteristics were well balanced between DFI and DFU, on imaging osteomyelitis and tissue swelling were significantly more in DFI. Endovascular radiological procedures showed angiograms to be considerably more in DFI, while angioplasty was more in DFU, in addition to smoking. Bacteremia was uncommon, and swab cultures were mostly polymicrobial in both ulcers;no clear association with blood bacteria was detected with the polymicrobial growth, though few were concordant. Antimicrobials prescribed for both ulcers were not statistically different except for carbapenems, which were more in DFI (P Conclusion: Attention should be paid to best practices while caring for diabetic ulcers. These include swab culture interpretations, the use of antimicrobials, and plan management according to DFI or DFU to utilize either local care or combination with antimicrobials.展开更多
文摘Background Frailty is a major determinant of outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease(CAD)undergoing lower limb amputation.This study evaluates the impact of frailty on in-hospital outcomes in these patients.Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample(2016–2021)to identify adult patients with CAD who underwent lower limb amputation.Frailty was defined using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups(ACG)frailty indicator.Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the independent association of frailty with in-hospital outcomes,and propensity score matching(PSM)was performed to further account for confounding factors.Results After PSM,9,990 patients were included in each cohort.Frail patients experienced higher rates of in-hospital mortality(3.9%vs.1.5%,P<0.001),acute limb ischemia(3.8%vs.3.1%,P=0.015),fasciotomy(2.1%vs.1.4%,P<0.001),stump infection(7.9%vs.6.6%,P<0.001),cardiogenic shock(0.9%vs.0.7%,P=0.032),sudden cardiac arrest(2.7%vs.2.1%,P=0.004),mechanical circulatory support(0.3%vs.0.2%,P=0.028),major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events(7.7%vs.5.4%,P<0.001),and sepsis(18.3%vs.13.8%,P<0.001).In multivariable logistic regression analysis,frailty remained an independent predictor of inhospital mortality and major complications.Conclusion Frailty is independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality and adverse events among CAD patients undergoing lower limb amputation.Incorporating frailty assessment into preoperative evaluation may improve risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making in this high-risk population.
文摘Rehabilitation of lower limb amputation in developing countries is quite challenging.Though there are basic to highly advanced prostheses available in India,the set-up is still facing difficulties in developing countries.Prosthetic management is difficult due to lack of availability of prostheses and reduced affordability among low income populations.In this review we highlighted the lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation status in India.Currently,India is advancing well in the rehabilitation field,but further studies are required to provide more evidence and recommendation.
文摘Peripheral vascular disease is the main reason for lower limb amputation, mostly present in old persons. The number of lower limb amputations due to cancer is small, but affects all age groups. Surgery is the primary （main） treatment for most bone tumors, the main goal is to remove all of the tumor. Sometimes limb amputation is the only possible solution, resulting in severe impairment of body function and activity limitations. The final goal of rehabilitation is to enable patients to re-integrate to the highest possible level into their previous social life and work. The article presents the functional outcome of patients with lower limb amputation due to oncological disease--cancer of bone or soft tissue admitted for rehabilitation to the University Rehabilitation Institute So^a in the period from 2002 to 2012. During this period 67 amputees were admitted and 60 of them were fitted with appropriate lower limb prosthesis. Younger age and transtibial level of amputation were of better functional outcome than in transfemoral or hip disarticulation amputees.
文摘Background: Confusion often arises in caring for diabetic foot infections and ulcers, especially with antimicrobials;we aim to shed light on this entity and alert healthcare workers to its stewardship. Methods: Records were reviewed between February 2016 and September 2023. Data for patients diagnosed with diabetes and foot ulcers, infected or not, were examined following ICD 9 search terms. Records for patients were included if they were prediabetic/diabetic adults with foot ulcers, more than 18 years old, and on antidiabetic treatment. Patients were excluded if they insulin resistant, with normal HgbA1c levels, wheel-chair dependent, bed-bound, non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients who had vascular lower limb surgery earlier to ulcers, diabetic patients who had aortocoronary bypass, deep venous thrombosis within six months, malignancy, and severe clinical depression. A modified IWGDF/IDSA guidelines definitions for DFI and DFU was considered. Statistical analysis was done using R programming. Statistical methods were employed as appropriate, and a significant P-value was considered for P Results: Most characteristics were well balanced between DFI and DFU, on imaging osteomyelitis and tissue swelling were significantly more in DFI. Endovascular radiological procedures showed angiograms to be considerably more in DFI, while angioplasty was more in DFU, in addition to smoking. Bacteremia was uncommon, and swab cultures were mostly polymicrobial in both ulcers;no clear association with blood bacteria was detected with the polymicrobial growth, though few were concordant. Antimicrobials prescribed for both ulcers were not statistically different except for carbapenems, which were more in DFI (P Conclusion: Attention should be paid to best practices while caring for diabetic ulcers. These include swab culture interpretations, the use of antimicrobials, and plan management according to DFI or DFU to utilize either local care or combination with antimicrobials.
