This study addresses the energy-intensive challenge of small-scale biogas upgrading by optimizing a chemical absorption process employing methyl diethanolamine(MDEA).Focusing on a typical distributed application of 30...This study addresses the energy-intensive challenge of small-scale biogas upgrading by optimizing a chemical absorption process employing methyl diethanolamine(MDEA).Focusing on a typical distributed application of 300 Nm^(3)/d,we developed an integrated simulation-optimization framework using Aspen HYSYS 14.0 to systematically evaluate the effects of critical operating parameters—absorption pressure,MDEA concentration,flow rate,temperature,number of trays,and reboiler duty—on methane purity and energy consumption.The key finding is the identification of an optimal parameter set:absorption pressure of 1200 kPa,MDEA concentration of 20mol%,lean flow rate of 2.5 kmol/h,temperature of 298.15 K,20 absorber trays,10 regenerator trays,and a reboiler duty of 4 kW,which enabled the product gas to achieve a high CH4 concentration of 97mol%,compliant with pipeline standards.A detailed energy consumption analysis revealed that the reboiler is the most energy-intensive unit,accounting for 75.40%of the total 5.29 kW energy consumption,followed by the gas compressor(23.38%).The specific energy consumption for CH4 recovery and the Energy Consumption Index(ECI)were quantified at 0.8852 kWh/kg CH_(4)and 6.82,respectively.This work provides a validated optimization strategy and critical energy breakdown,offering practical guidance for enhancing the technical and economic viability of small-scale,centralized biogas purification systems.展开更多
基金funded by Shenzhen Science and Technology Program,grant number No.ZDSYS20230626091400001No.KCXST20221021111609024No.KCXFZ20240903093459001.
文摘This study addresses the energy-intensive challenge of small-scale biogas upgrading by optimizing a chemical absorption process employing methyl diethanolamine(MDEA).Focusing on a typical distributed application of 300 Nm^(3)/d,we developed an integrated simulation-optimization framework using Aspen HYSYS 14.0 to systematically evaluate the effects of critical operating parameters—absorption pressure,MDEA concentration,flow rate,temperature,number of trays,and reboiler duty—on methane purity and energy consumption.The key finding is the identification of an optimal parameter set:absorption pressure of 1200 kPa,MDEA concentration of 20mol%,lean flow rate of 2.5 kmol/h,temperature of 298.15 K,20 absorber trays,10 regenerator trays,and a reboiler duty of 4 kW,which enabled the product gas to achieve a high CH4 concentration of 97mol%,compliant with pipeline standards.A detailed energy consumption analysis revealed that the reboiler is the most energy-intensive unit,accounting for 75.40%of the total 5.29 kW energy consumption,followed by the gas compressor(23.38%).The specific energy consumption for CH4 recovery and the Energy Consumption Index(ECI)were quantified at 0.8852 kWh/kg CH_(4)and 6.82,respectively.This work provides a validated optimization strategy and critical energy breakdown,offering practical guidance for enhancing the technical and economic viability of small-scale,centralized biogas purification systems.
