This review comprehensively summarized the potential of artificial intelligence(AI)in the management of esophageal cancer.It highlighted the significance of AI-assisted endoscopy in Japan where endoscopy is central to...This review comprehensively summarized the potential of artificial intelligence(AI)in the management of esophageal cancer.It highlighted the significance of AI-assisted endoscopy in Japan where endoscopy is central to both screening and diagnosis.For the clinical adaptation of AI,several challenges remain for its effective translation.The establishment of high-quality clinical databases,such as the National Clinical Database and Japan Endoscopy Database in Japan,which covers almost all cases of esophageal cancer,is essential for validating multimodal AI models.This requires rigorous external validation using diverse datasets,including those from different endoscope manufacturers and image qualities.Furthermore,endoscopists’skills significantly affect diagnostic accuracy,suggesting that AI should serve as a supportive tool rather than a replacement.Addressing these challenges,along with country-specific legal and ethical considerations,will facilitate the successful integration of multimodal AI into the management of esophageal cancer,particularly in endoscopic diagnosis,and contribute to improved patient outcomes.Although this review focused on Japan as a case study,the challenges and solutions described are broadly applicable to other high-incidence regions.展开更多
BACKGROUND The liver represents a common site of distant metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer(EC).Conventional chemotherapy(CMT)presents limited efficacy for EC,and EC patients with liver metastases typically...BACKGROUND The liver represents a common site of distant metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer(EC).Conventional chemotherapy(CMT)presents limited efficacy for EC,and EC patients with liver metastases typically experience a poor prognosis,highlighting an urgent need to explore novel treatment approaches.This study evaluated the overall efficacy and safety of CMT vs CMT combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)in the treatment of EC patients with liver metastases.Furthermore,prognostic factors influencing outcomes in this patient population were identified.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line chemoimmunotherapy for EC patients with liver metastases and to analyze prognostic factors.METHODS This retrospective study included 126 EC patients with liver metastases at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between 2014 and 2024.Patients receiving CMT were compared with those receiving CMT+ICI.Analyzed variables included clinicopathological features,treatment history,characteristics of metastasis,systemic and local treatments,overall survival(OS),and treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs).Prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression models.Finally,efficacy outcomes and TRAE profiles were compared between the two groups.RESULTS A significant difference in median OS was identified between the two groups(10.8 months in the CMT group vs 20.8 months in the CMT+ICI group,P=0.004).The CMT+ICI group also demonstrated a significantly longer median progression-free survival of 11.7 months(P<0.001).Patients receiving combination therapy exhibited significantly improved systemic objective response rate and disease control rate.Multivariate analysis identified key factors significantly influencing OS in EC patients with liver metastases:Karnofsky Performance Status score≥70,receipt of local therapy for liver metastases,and the number of cycles of CMT and immunotherapy received.Furthermore,the incidence of TRAEs did not significantly differ between the CMT+ICI and CMT groups.CONCLUSION For EC patients with liver metastases,the combination of CMT and ICIs demonstrates significantly superior efficacy compared with CMT alone,while maintaining manageable TRAEs.展开更多
BACKGROUND Esophageal cancer is highly malignant and frequently metastasizes to bones.Concomitant depression worsens prognosis;however,its incidence and determinants in this specific population remain poorly defined.A...BACKGROUND Esophageal cancer is highly malignant and frequently metastasizes to bones.Concomitant depression worsens prognosis;however,its incidence and determinants in this specific population remain poorly defined.AIM To determine the incidence of depression and its independent risk factors in patients with esophageal cancer and bone metastasis.METHODS A total of 100 consecutive eligible patients admitted between March 2022 and March 2025 were recruited.Depression was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II;scores>4 defined the depression group(n=42)and scores≤4 the non-depression group(n=58).Demographic,clinical,and laboratory variables were compared between the groups.Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors.RESULTS Depression prevalence was 42.0%(42/100).Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences in monthly per-capita household income,education level,social support,sleep disorders,and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(all P<0.05);no differences were observed in sex,age,tumor characteristics,or other laboratory indices(all P>0.05).Multivariable analysis revealed the following independent risk factors for depression:Low income[odds ratio(OR)=2.66,95%confidence interval(CI):1.17-6.03],low education(OR=2.46,95%CI:1.08-5.61),low social support(OR=5.10,95%CI:1.81-14.39),sleep disorders(OR=2.79,95%CI:1.23-6.35),and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(OR=1.31 per unit increase,95%CI:1.18-1.46).CONCLUSION Depression is common among patients with esophageal cancer and bone metastasis.Low socioeconomic status,limited education,insufficient social support,sleep disturbances,and systemic inflammation were independent predictors.Interventions that address these modifiable factors may reduce depression risk in this population.展开更多
基金Supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,No.24K11935.
文摘This review comprehensively summarized the potential of artificial intelligence(AI)in the management of esophageal cancer.It highlighted the significance of AI-assisted endoscopy in Japan where endoscopy is central to both screening and diagnosis.For the clinical adaptation of AI,several challenges remain for its effective translation.The establishment of high-quality clinical databases,such as the National Clinical Database and Japan Endoscopy Database in Japan,which covers almost all cases of esophageal cancer,is essential for validating multimodal AI models.This requires rigorous external validation using diverse datasets,including those from different endoscope manufacturers and image qualities.Furthermore,endoscopists’skills significantly affect diagnostic accuracy,suggesting that AI should serve as a supportive tool rather than a replacement.Addressing these challenges,along with country-specific legal and ethical considerations,will facilitate the successful integration of multimodal AI into the management of esophageal cancer,particularly in endoscopic diagnosis,and contribute to improved patient outcomes.Although this review focused on Japan as a case study,the challenges and solutions described are broadly applicable to other high-incidence regions.
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82303672Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission and Zhejiang Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine through the Targeted Project for Medical and Health Research,No.2025ZL017and China Primary Health Care Foundation,No.ZLMY20240311001ZJ.
文摘BACKGROUND The liver represents a common site of distant metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer(EC).Conventional chemotherapy(CMT)presents limited efficacy for EC,and EC patients with liver metastases typically experience a poor prognosis,highlighting an urgent need to explore novel treatment approaches.This study evaluated the overall efficacy and safety of CMT vs CMT combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)in the treatment of EC patients with liver metastases.Furthermore,prognostic factors influencing outcomes in this patient population were identified.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line chemoimmunotherapy for EC patients with liver metastases and to analyze prognostic factors.METHODS This retrospective study included 126 EC patients with liver metastases at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between 2014 and 2024.Patients receiving CMT were compared with those receiving CMT+ICI.Analyzed variables included clinicopathological features,treatment history,characteristics of metastasis,systemic and local treatments,overall survival(OS),and treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs).Prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression models.Finally,efficacy outcomes and TRAE profiles were compared between the two groups.RESULTS A significant difference in median OS was identified between the two groups(10.8 months in the CMT group vs 20.8 months in the CMT+ICI group,P=0.004).The CMT+ICI group also demonstrated a significantly longer median progression-free survival of 11.7 months(P<0.001).Patients receiving combination therapy exhibited significantly improved systemic objective response rate and disease control rate.Multivariate analysis identified key factors significantly influencing OS in EC patients with liver metastases:Karnofsky Performance Status score≥70,receipt of local therapy for liver metastases,and the number of cycles of CMT and immunotherapy received.Furthermore,the incidence of TRAEs did not significantly differ between the CMT+ICI and CMT groups.CONCLUSION For EC patients with liver metastases,the combination of CMT and ICIs demonstrates significantly superior efficacy compared with CMT alone,while maintaining manageable TRAEs.
文摘BACKGROUND Esophageal cancer is highly malignant and frequently metastasizes to bones.Concomitant depression worsens prognosis;however,its incidence and determinants in this specific population remain poorly defined.AIM To determine the incidence of depression and its independent risk factors in patients with esophageal cancer and bone metastasis.METHODS A total of 100 consecutive eligible patients admitted between March 2022 and March 2025 were recruited.Depression was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II;scores>4 defined the depression group(n=42)and scores≤4 the non-depression group(n=58).Demographic,clinical,and laboratory variables were compared between the groups.Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors.RESULTS Depression prevalence was 42.0%(42/100).Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences in monthly per-capita household income,education level,social support,sleep disorders,and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(all P<0.05);no differences were observed in sex,age,tumor characteristics,or other laboratory indices(all P>0.05).Multivariable analysis revealed the following independent risk factors for depression:Low income[odds ratio(OR)=2.66,95%confidence interval(CI):1.17-6.03],low education(OR=2.46,95%CI:1.08-5.61),low social support(OR=5.10,95%CI:1.81-14.39),sleep disorders(OR=2.79,95%CI:1.23-6.35),and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(OR=1.31 per unit increase,95%CI:1.18-1.46).CONCLUSION Depression is common among patients with esophageal cancer and bone metastasis.Low socioeconomic status,limited education,insufficient social support,sleep disturbances,and systemic inflammation were independent predictors.Interventions that address these modifiable factors may reduce depression risk in this population.
