目的:长期运动被推荐作为减肥手段,但对肥胖或超重人群食欲激素的具体影响仍不清晰。为此,通过Meta分析评估长期运动对肥胖或超重群体食欲激素的干预效果。方法:系统检索PubMed、EBSCO、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Embase从建库...目的:长期运动被推荐作为减肥手段,但对肥胖或超重人群食欲激素的具体影响仍不清晰。为此,通过Meta分析评估长期运动对肥胖或超重群体食欲激素的干预效果。方法:系统检索PubMed、EBSCO、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Embase从建库至2024年12月的随机对照试验。研究对象为超重或肥胖人群,结局指标为食欲激素(胃饥饿素、酰化胃饥饿素、酪酪肽、胰高血糖素样肽1)。使用Review Manager 5.4和Stata 16软件对纳入文献进行Meta分析。结果:长期运动干预显著提升胃饥饿素(SMD=0.46,P=0.007)和胰高血糖素肽1(SMD=0.43,P=0.04)水平,对酰化胃饥饿素(SMD=-0.18,P=0.39)和酪酪肽(SMD=0.23,P=0.39)的调节作用不显著。结果异质性较高,提示个体差异和干预方案对效果有潜在影响。高强度间歇训练调节食欲激素的效果显著,抗阻运动次之,但具体机制尚不明确。短周期的运动训练对于酪酪肽和胰高血糖素样肽1的影响更加显著,但效果随周期延长逐渐减弱。结论:长期运动通过调节食欲激素对肥胖或超重人群的食欲产生抑制作用,高强度间歇训练和抗阻运动在这一领域表现出独特的干预效果,值得进一步深入研究。展开更多
Medical Data Mining published an article entitled Mapping the global research trends and hotspots on hypertensive nephropathy:A novel bibliometrics overview on 10 October 2025.The author confirmed this article’s proo...Medical Data Mining published an article entitled Mapping the global research trends and hotspots on hypertensive nephropathy:A novel bibliometrics overview on 10 October 2025.The author confirmed this article’s proof on 28 September 2025 without any questions.However,on 13 November 2025,the Editorial Office of Medical Data Mining noticed an inconsistency between the data presented in the main text and Figure 1.Specifically,erroneous Figure 1 states“a total of 56,691 literatures were obtained through database search”,while the main text in the Search results section states“According to the search term,a total of 59,220 publications were retrieved from the database.”The authors acknowledge that the original version of Figure 1 was incorrect and have provided the revised,correct version in this corrigendum.The authors would like to assert that there is no change in the body text of the article.展开更多
文摘Medical Data Mining published an article entitled Mapping the global research trends and hotspots on hypertensive nephropathy:A novel bibliometrics overview on 10 October 2025.The author confirmed this article’s proof on 28 September 2025 without any questions.However,on 13 November 2025,the Editorial Office of Medical Data Mining noticed an inconsistency between the data presented in the main text and Figure 1.Specifically,erroneous Figure 1 states“a total of 56,691 literatures were obtained through database search”,while the main text in the Search results section states“According to the search term,a total of 59,220 publications were retrieved from the database.”The authors acknowledge that the original version of Figure 1 was incorrect and have provided the revised,correct version in this corrigendum.The authors would like to assert that there is no change in the body text of the article.
