Objective With the increasing publication of clinical practice guidelines(CPG)for Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)and Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine(IM),the standardization and scientifiction of ...Objective With the increasing publication of clinical practice guidelines(CPG)for Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)and Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine(IM),the standardization and scientifiction of its formulation have gradually attracted many people’s attention.To offer an overview of TCM and IM CPGs published over the past decade and analyze their general characteristics and methodological quality.Methods The China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)and WANFANG databases were searched for clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus papers from January 2010 to June 2021.Two researchers independently completed the literature screening and cross-checking according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of CPGs and extracted information on general characteristics and methodological quality of CPGs.Results According to the selection criteria,231 CPGs(EB-CPGs=119,CBCPGs=112)were selected and the number of CPGs published in the 11 years showed an overall upward trend.The vast majority of CPGs used the Western naming system for the diseases,and only 11 CPGs were named of TCM diseases or symptoms.TCM treatments were recommended in 223 CPGs.There were 156 ancient Chinese Medicine literature sources cited in 231 CPGs and opinions and experiences of 62 TCM experts cited in 37 CPGs.The methodological quality of EB-CPGs for TCM and IM were significantly better than CB-CPGs in 11 items.Only 60 EB-CPGs and 7 CB-CPGs designated clear criteria for grading quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations and 74 CPGs presented both the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations.We classified all CPGs according to whether or not they used GRADE,and the results showed that the CPGs using GRADE had higher methodological quality and more standardized reports.Conclusion This research has shown that the quantity and quality of CPGs in both TCM and IM have improved over the time span,but the methodological quality,especially evidence citation,and the use of criteria for grading quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations,still needs to further improvement in the future.展开更多
基金This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.82174230 and No.81904055).
文摘Objective With the increasing publication of clinical practice guidelines(CPG)for Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)and Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine(IM),the standardization and scientifiction of its formulation have gradually attracted many people’s attention.To offer an overview of TCM and IM CPGs published over the past decade and analyze their general characteristics and methodological quality.Methods The China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)and WANFANG databases were searched for clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus papers from January 2010 to June 2021.Two researchers independently completed the literature screening and cross-checking according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of CPGs and extracted information on general characteristics and methodological quality of CPGs.Results According to the selection criteria,231 CPGs(EB-CPGs=119,CBCPGs=112)were selected and the number of CPGs published in the 11 years showed an overall upward trend.The vast majority of CPGs used the Western naming system for the diseases,and only 11 CPGs were named of TCM diseases or symptoms.TCM treatments were recommended in 223 CPGs.There were 156 ancient Chinese Medicine literature sources cited in 231 CPGs and opinions and experiences of 62 TCM experts cited in 37 CPGs.The methodological quality of EB-CPGs for TCM and IM were significantly better than CB-CPGs in 11 items.Only 60 EB-CPGs and 7 CB-CPGs designated clear criteria for grading quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations and 74 CPGs presented both the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations.We classified all CPGs according to whether or not they used GRADE,and the results showed that the CPGs using GRADE had higher methodological quality and more standardized reports.Conclusion This research has shown that the quantity and quality of CPGs in both TCM and IM have improved over the time span,but the methodological quality,especially evidence citation,and the use of criteria for grading quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations,still needs to further improvement in the future.
