BACKGROUND Pleomorphic adenoma(PA)is the most common type of salivary gland tumor,and its common sites are parotid gland,sinus,nasal septum and cleft palate.PA is an uncommon benign type of tumor occurring in the brea...BACKGROUND Pleomorphic adenoma(PA)is the most common type of salivary gland tumor,and its common sites are parotid gland,sinus,nasal septum and cleft palate.PA is an uncommon benign type of tumor occurring in the breast,and there are few reports of cases in Asia.CASE SUMMARY An 84-year-old woman found a mass in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast>1 year ago.The patient underwent a right breast lumpectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy.The pathological diagnosis was PA in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast,and the malignant component was malignant adenomyoepithelioma.The postoperative course was uneventful,and no chemotherapy was administered.At 18 mo of follow-up,the patient is alive and well,with no evidence of recurrent disease.CONCLUSION Patients with breast PA should first undergo extended excision of breast masses followed by pathological examination.If malignancy is confirmed or the surgical margin is positive,modified radical mastectomy should be performed.展开更多
In design patent infringement litigation,the accused infringer has a variety of defense measures,among which the existing design defense and patent validity defense usually involve the same evidence.The defense of the...In design patent infringement litigation,the accused infringer has a variety of defense measures,among which the existing design defense and patent validity defense usually involve the same evidence.The defense of the validity of patent rights is to file an invalidation request to the China National Intellectual Property Administration(hereinafter referred to as"CNIPA")against the plaintiff's involved patent.The existing design defense is to raise an existing design defense in the litigation process.In practice,in order to ensure the success of the litigation case,the accused party usually adopts the above two defense measures at the same time.This article will take a recent case as a perspective to explain in detail the different functions of the existing design defense in the litigation procedure and the same evidence in the patent invalidation procedure.展开更多
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81874063Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province,No.2008085QH408.
文摘BACKGROUND Pleomorphic adenoma(PA)is the most common type of salivary gland tumor,and its common sites are parotid gland,sinus,nasal septum and cleft palate.PA is an uncommon benign type of tumor occurring in the breast,and there are few reports of cases in Asia.CASE SUMMARY An 84-year-old woman found a mass in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast>1 year ago.The patient underwent a right breast lumpectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy.The pathological diagnosis was PA in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast,and the malignant component was malignant adenomyoepithelioma.The postoperative course was uneventful,and no chemotherapy was administered.At 18 mo of follow-up,the patient is alive and well,with no evidence of recurrent disease.CONCLUSION Patients with breast PA should first undergo extended excision of breast masses followed by pathological examination.If malignancy is confirmed or the surgical margin is positive,modified radical mastectomy should be performed.
文摘In design patent infringement litigation,the accused infringer has a variety of defense measures,among which the existing design defense and patent validity defense usually involve the same evidence.The defense of the validity of patent rights is to file an invalidation request to the China National Intellectual Property Administration(hereinafter referred to as"CNIPA")against the plaintiff's involved patent.The existing design defense is to raise an existing design defense in the litigation process.In practice,in order to ensure the success of the litigation case,the accused party usually adopts the above two defense measures at the same time.This article will take a recent case as a perspective to explain in detail the different functions of the existing design defense in the litigation procedure and the same evidence in the patent invalidation procedure.
