Background: The beneficial effects of Lactobacillus probiotics in animal production are often strain-related.Different strains from the same species may exert different weight-gain effect on hosts in vivo. Most lactob...Background: The beneficial effects of Lactobacillus probiotics in animal production are often strain-related.Different strains from the same species may exert different weight-gain effect on hosts in vivo. Most lactobacilli are selected based on their in vitro activities, and their metabolism and regulation on the intestine based on strainrelated characters are largely unexplored. The objective of the present study was to study the in vivo effects of the three lactobacilli on growth performance and to compare the differential effects of the strains on the faecal microbiota and ileum mucosa proteomics of piglets.Methods: Three hundred and sixty piglets were assigned to one of four treatments, which included an antibioticstreated control and three experimental groups supplemented with the three lactobacilli, L. salivarius G1-1, L. reuteri G8-5 and L. reuteri G22-2, respectively. Piglets were weighed and the feed intake was recorded to compare the growth performance. The faecal lactobacilli and coliform was quantified using quantitative PCR and the faecal microbiota was profiled by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis(DGGE). The proteomic approach was applied to compare the differential expression of proteins in the ileum mucosa.Results: No statistical difference was found among the three Lactobacillus-treated groups in animal growth performance compared with the antibiotics-treated group(P > 0.05). Supplementation of lactobacilli in diets significantly increased the relative 16 S rRNA gene copies of Lactobacillus genus on both d 14 and d 28(P < 0.05).,and the bacterial community profiles based on DGGE from the lactobacilli-treated groups were distinctly different from the antibiotics-treated group(P < 0.05). The ileum mucosa of piglets responded to all Lactobacillus supplementation by producing more newly expressed proteins and the identified proteins were all associated with the functions beneficial for stabilization of cell structure. Besides, some other up-regulated and down-regulated proteins in different Lactobacillus-treated groups showed the expression of proteins were partly strain-related.Conclusions: All the three lactobacilli in this study show comparable effects to antibiotics on piglets growth performance. The three lactobacilli were found able to modify intestinal microbiota and mucosa proteomics. The regulation of protein expression in the intestinal mucosa are partly associated with the strains administrated in feed.展开更多
基金financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.31372348No.31672455)the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(CZY15026)
文摘Background: The beneficial effects of Lactobacillus probiotics in animal production are often strain-related.Different strains from the same species may exert different weight-gain effect on hosts in vivo. Most lactobacilli are selected based on their in vitro activities, and their metabolism and regulation on the intestine based on strainrelated characters are largely unexplored. The objective of the present study was to study the in vivo effects of the three lactobacilli on growth performance and to compare the differential effects of the strains on the faecal microbiota and ileum mucosa proteomics of piglets.Methods: Three hundred and sixty piglets were assigned to one of four treatments, which included an antibioticstreated control and three experimental groups supplemented with the three lactobacilli, L. salivarius G1-1, L. reuteri G8-5 and L. reuteri G22-2, respectively. Piglets were weighed and the feed intake was recorded to compare the growth performance. The faecal lactobacilli and coliform was quantified using quantitative PCR and the faecal microbiota was profiled by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis(DGGE). The proteomic approach was applied to compare the differential expression of proteins in the ileum mucosa.Results: No statistical difference was found among the three Lactobacillus-treated groups in animal growth performance compared with the antibiotics-treated group(P > 0.05). Supplementation of lactobacilli in diets significantly increased the relative 16 S rRNA gene copies of Lactobacillus genus on both d 14 and d 28(P < 0.05).,and the bacterial community profiles based on DGGE from the lactobacilli-treated groups were distinctly different from the antibiotics-treated group(P < 0.05). The ileum mucosa of piglets responded to all Lactobacillus supplementation by producing more newly expressed proteins and the identified proteins were all associated with the functions beneficial for stabilization of cell structure. Besides, some other up-regulated and down-regulated proteins in different Lactobacillus-treated groups showed the expression of proteins were partly strain-related.Conclusions: All the three lactobacilli in this study show comparable effects to antibiotics on piglets growth performance. The three lactobacilli were found able to modify intestinal microbiota and mucosa proteomics. The regulation of protein expression in the intestinal mucosa are partly associated with the strains administrated in feed.
