BACKGROUND Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis,but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.AIM To investigate the diagnostic performanc...BACKGROUND Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis,but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.AIM To investigate the diagnostic performance of three fibrosis noninvasive tests[FibroTest,vibration-controlled transient elastography(VCTE),and the fibrosis-4 index(FIB-4)and two activity biomarkers(alanine aminotransferase(ALT)and ActiTest].METHODS This study enrolled 103 patients for whom liver biopsy,hepatic elastography results,and laboratory markers were available.Diagnostic performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves,the Obuchowski measure(OM),and the Bayesian latent class model.RESULTS FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 in cases of significant fibrosis(≥F2),with areas under the ROC curve of 0.83[95%confidence interval(CI):0.73-0.90],0.86(95%CI:0.77-0.92),and 0.71(95%CI:0.60-0.80),respectively.The mean(standard error)OM values were 0.92(0.01),0.93(0.01),and 0.88(0.02)for FibroTest,VCTE,and FIB-4,respectively;FibroTest and VCTE performed comparably,and both were superior to FIB-4(P=0.03 and P=0.005).The areas under the ROC curve values for activity biomarkers were 0.86(95%CI:0.76-0.92)for ActiTest and 0.84(95%CI:0.73-0.90)for ALT(P=0.06).The OM values for ActiTest and ALT were 0.92(0.02)and 0.90(0.02),respectively(P=0.005).CONCLUSION FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 according to the OM.FibroTest-ActiTest facilitated the evaluation of both fibrosis and activity.展开更多
AIM: To investigate the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) applicability and variability with reference to three probe positions according to the region of liver biopsy. METHODS: The applicability for LSM was defined a...AIM: To investigate the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) applicability and variability with reference to three probe positions according to the region of liver biopsy. METHODS: The applicability for LSM was defined as at least 10 valid measurements with a success rate greater than 60% and an interquartile range/median LSM < 30%. The LSM variability compared the inter-position concordance and the concordance with FibroTest. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty two consecutive patients were included. The applicability of the anterior position (81%) was significantly higher than that of the reference (69%) and lower positions (68%), (both P = 0.0001). There was a signif icant difference (0.5 kPa, 95% CI 0.13-0.89; P < 0.0001) between mean LSM estimated at the reference position (9.3 kPa) vs the anterior position (8.8 kPa). Discordance between positions was associated with thoracic fold (P = 0.008). The discordance rate between the reference position result and FibroTest was higher when the 7.1 kPa cutoff was used to define advanced fibrosis instead of 8.8 kPa (33.6% vs 23.5%, P = 0.03).CONCLUSION: The anterior position of the probe should be the fi rst choice for LSM using Fibroscan, as it has a higher applicability without higher variability compared to the usual liver biopsy position.展开更多
BACKGROUND The recommended monitoring tools for evaluating nucleot(s)ide analogue renal toxicity,such as estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)and phosphatemia,are late markers of proximal tubulopathy.Multiple ear...BACKGROUND The recommended monitoring tools for evaluating nucleot(s)ide analogue renal toxicity,such as estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)and phosphatemia,are late markers of proximal tubulopathy.Multiple early markers are available,but no consensus exists on their use.AIM To determine the 24 mo prevalence of subclinical proximal tubulopathy(SPT),as defined with early biomarkers,in treated vs untreated hepatitis B virus(HBV)-monoinfected patients.METHODS A prospective,non-randomized,multicenter study of HBV-monoinfected patients with a low number of renal comorbidities was conducted.The patients were separated into three groups:Naïve,starting entecavir(ETV)treatment,or starting tenofovir disoproxil(TDF)treatment.Data on the early markers of SPT,the eGFR and phosphatemia,were collected quarterly.SPT was defined as a maximal tubular reabsorption of phosphate/eGFR below 0.8 mmoL/L and/or uric acid fractional excretion above 10%.The prevalence and cumulative incidence of SPT at month 24(M24)were calculated.Quantitative data were analyzed using analyses of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests,whereas chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyze qualitative data.Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for any potential confounding factors.RESULTS Of the 196 patients analyzed,138(84 naïve,28 starting ETV,and 26 starting TDF)had no SPT at inclusion.At M24,the prevalence of SPT was not statistically different between naïve and either treated group(21.1%vs 30.7%,P<0.42 and 50.0%vs 30.7%,P=0.32 for ETV and TDF,respectively);no patient had an eGFR lower than 50 mL/min/1.73 m²or phosphatemia less than 0.48 mmoL/L.In the multivariate analysis,no explanatory variables were identified after adjustment.The cumulative incidence of SPT over 24 mo(25.5%,13.3%,and 52.9%in the naïve,ETV,and TDF groups,respectively)tended to be higher in the TDF group vs the naïve group(hazard ratio:2.283,P=0.05).SPT-free survival at M24 was 57.6%,68.8%,and 23.5%for the naïve,ETV,and TDF groups,respectively.The median survival time without SPT,evaluated only in the TDF group,was 5.9 mo.CONCLUSION The prevalence and incidence of SPT was higher in TDF-treated patients compared to naïve patients.SPT in the naïve population suggests that HBV can induce renal tubular toxicity.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis,but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.AIM To investigate the diagnostic performance of three fibrosis noninvasive tests[FibroTest,vibration-controlled transient elastography(VCTE),and the fibrosis-4 index(FIB-4)and two activity biomarkers(alanine aminotransferase(ALT)and ActiTest].METHODS This study enrolled 103 patients for whom liver biopsy,hepatic elastography results,and laboratory markers were available.Diagnostic performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves,the Obuchowski measure(OM),and the Bayesian latent class model.RESULTS FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 in cases of significant fibrosis(≥F2),with areas under the ROC curve of 0.83[95%confidence interval(CI):0.73-0.90],0.86(95%CI:0.77-0.92),and 0.71(95%CI:0.60-0.80),respectively.The mean(standard error)OM values were 0.92(0.01),0.93(0.01),and 0.88(0.02)for FibroTest,VCTE,and FIB-4,respectively;FibroTest and VCTE performed comparably,and both were superior to FIB-4(P=0.03 and P=0.005).The areas under the ROC curve values for activity biomarkers were 0.86(95%CI:0.76-0.92)for ActiTest and 0.84(95%CI:0.73-0.90)for ALT(P=0.06).The OM values for ActiTest and ALT were 0.92(0.02)and 0.90(0.02),respectively(P=0.005).CONCLUSION FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 according to the OM.FibroTest-ActiTest facilitated the evaluation of both fibrosis and activity.
文摘AIM: To investigate the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) applicability and variability with reference to three probe positions according to the region of liver biopsy. METHODS: The applicability for LSM was defined as at least 10 valid measurements with a success rate greater than 60% and an interquartile range/median LSM < 30%. The LSM variability compared the inter-position concordance and the concordance with FibroTest. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty two consecutive patients were included. The applicability of the anterior position (81%) was significantly higher than that of the reference (69%) and lower positions (68%), (both P = 0.0001). There was a signif icant difference (0.5 kPa, 95% CI 0.13-0.89; P < 0.0001) between mean LSM estimated at the reference position (9.3 kPa) vs the anterior position (8.8 kPa). Discordance between positions was associated with thoracic fold (P = 0.008). The discordance rate between the reference position result and FibroTest was higher when the 7.1 kPa cutoff was used to define advanced fibrosis instead of 8.8 kPa (33.6% vs 23.5%, P = 0.03).CONCLUSION: The anterior position of the probe should be the fi rst choice for LSM using Fibroscan, as it has a higher applicability without higher variability compared to the usual liver biopsy position.
文摘BACKGROUND The recommended monitoring tools for evaluating nucleot(s)ide analogue renal toxicity,such as estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)and phosphatemia,are late markers of proximal tubulopathy.Multiple early markers are available,but no consensus exists on their use.AIM To determine the 24 mo prevalence of subclinical proximal tubulopathy(SPT),as defined with early biomarkers,in treated vs untreated hepatitis B virus(HBV)-monoinfected patients.METHODS A prospective,non-randomized,multicenter study of HBV-monoinfected patients with a low number of renal comorbidities was conducted.The patients were separated into three groups:Naïve,starting entecavir(ETV)treatment,or starting tenofovir disoproxil(TDF)treatment.Data on the early markers of SPT,the eGFR and phosphatemia,were collected quarterly.SPT was defined as a maximal tubular reabsorption of phosphate/eGFR below 0.8 mmoL/L and/or uric acid fractional excretion above 10%.The prevalence and cumulative incidence of SPT at month 24(M24)were calculated.Quantitative data were analyzed using analyses of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests,whereas chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyze qualitative data.Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for any potential confounding factors.RESULTS Of the 196 patients analyzed,138(84 naïve,28 starting ETV,and 26 starting TDF)had no SPT at inclusion.At M24,the prevalence of SPT was not statistically different between naïve and either treated group(21.1%vs 30.7%,P<0.42 and 50.0%vs 30.7%,P=0.32 for ETV and TDF,respectively);no patient had an eGFR lower than 50 mL/min/1.73 m²or phosphatemia less than 0.48 mmoL/L.In the multivariate analysis,no explanatory variables were identified after adjustment.The cumulative incidence of SPT over 24 mo(25.5%,13.3%,and 52.9%in the naïve,ETV,and TDF groups,respectively)tended to be higher in the TDF group vs the naïve group(hazard ratio:2.283,P=0.05).SPT-free survival at M24 was 57.6%,68.8%,and 23.5%for the naïve,ETV,and TDF groups,respectively.The median survival time without SPT,evaluated only in the TDF group,was 5.9 mo.CONCLUSION The prevalence and incidence of SPT was higher in TDF-treated patients compared to naïve patients.SPT in the naïve population suggests that HBV can induce renal tubular toxicity.
