Current guidelines for treating asymptomatic common bile duct stones(CBDS)recommend stone removal,with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography(ERCP)being the first treatment choice.When deciding on ERCP treatm...Current guidelines for treating asymptomatic common bile duct stones(CBDS)recommend stone removal,with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography(ERCP)being the first treatment choice.When deciding on ERCP treatment for asymptomatic CBDS,the risk of ERCP-related complications and outcome of natural history of asymptomatic CBDS should be compared.The incidence rate of ERCP-related complications,particularly of post-ERCP pancreatitis for asymptomatic CBDS,was reportedly higher than that of symptomatic CBDS,increasing the risk of ERCP-related complications for asymptomatic CBDS compared with that previously reported for biliopancreatic diseases.Although studies have reported short-to middle-term outcomes of natural history of asymptomatic CBDS,its long-term natural history is not well known.Till date,there are no prospective studies that determined whether ERCP has a better outcome than no treatment in patients with asymptomatic CBDS or not.No randomized controlled trial has evaluated the risk of early and late ERCP-related complications vs the risk of biliary complications in the wait-and-see approach,suggesting that a change is needed in our perspective on endoscopic treatment for asymptomatic CBDS.Further studies examining long-term complication risks of ERCP and wait-and-see groups for asymptomatic CBDS are warranted to discuss whether routine endoscopic treatment for asymptomatic CBDS is justified or not.展开更多
BACKGROUND As the aging population grows worldwide,the rates of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)for common bile duct stones(CBDS)in older patients with a poor performance status(PS)have been increa...BACKGROUND As the aging population grows worldwide,the rates of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)for common bile duct stones(CBDS)in older patients with a poor performance status(PS)have been increasing.However,the data on the safety and efficacy of ERCP for CBDS in patients with a PS score of 3 or 4 are lacking,with only a few studies having investigated this issue among patients with poor PS.AIM To examine the safety and efficacy of ERCP for CBDS in patients with a PS score of 3 or 4.METHODS This study utilized a retrospective multi-centered design of three institutions in Japan for 8 years to identify a total of 1343 patients with CBDS having native papillae who underwent therapeutic ERCP.As a result,1113 patients with a PS 0-2 and 230 patients with a PS 3-4 were included.One-to-one propensity-score matching was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of ERCP for CBDS between patients with a PS 0-2 and those with a PS 3-4.RESULTS The overall ERCP-related complication rates in all patients and propensity score-matched patients with a PS 0-2 and 3-4 were 9.0%(100/1113)and 7.0%(16/230;P=0.37),and 4.6%(9/196)and 6.6%(13/196;P=0.51),respectively.In the propensity score-matched patients,complications were significantly more severe in the group with a PS 3-4 than in the group with a PS 0-2 group(P=0.042).Risk factors for complications were indications of ERCP and absence of antibiotics in the multivariate analysis.Therapeutic success rates,including complete CBDS removal and permanent biliary stent placement,in propensity score-matched patients with a PS 0-2 and 3-4 were 97.4%(191/196)and 97.4%(191/196),respectively(P=1.0).CONCLUSION ERCP for CBDS can be effectively performed in patients with a PS 3 or 4.Nevertheless,the indication for ERCP in such patients should be carefully considered with prophylactic antibiotics.展开更多
Prophylaxis is important for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)pancreatitis(PEP),which is the most common and serious complication of ERCP.Although the current guidelines include independent pat...Prophylaxis is important for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)pancreatitis(PEP),which is the most common and serious complication of ERCP.Although the current guidelines include independent patient-and procedure-related risk factors for PEP and available PEP prophylactic measures,the synergistic effect of these risk factors on PEP should also be considered,given that patients often harbor multiple risk factors.Furthermore,a combination of prophylactic measures is often selected in clinical practice.However,established methods estimating the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP incidence are lacking,and evidence on the impact of combining prophylactic measures on PEP should be discussed.Selection of appropriate candidate patients for ERCP is also important to reduce the incidence of PEP associated with unnecessary ERCP.ERCP indications in patients with asymptomatic common bile duct stones(CBDSs)and in those with suspected CBDSs with no imaging-based evidence of stones are controversial.Further studies are warranted to predict the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP,determine the best prophylactic PEP measures,and identify appropriate candidates for ERCP in patients with asymptomatic CBDSs and those with suspected CBDSs.展开更多
Stones in the common bile duct(CBD) are reported worldwide, and this condition is majorly managed through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP). CBD stone recurrence is an important issue after endoscop...Stones in the common bile duct(CBD) are reported worldwide, and this condition is majorly managed through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP). CBD stone recurrence is an important issue after endoscopic stone removal. Therefore, it is essential to identify its risk factors to determine the necessity of regular follow-up in patients who underwent endoscopic removal of CBD stones. The authors identified that the S and polyline morphological subtypes of CBD were associated with increased stone recurrence. New morphological subtypes of CBD presented by the authors can be important risk predictors of recurrence after endoscopic stone removal. Furthermore, the new morphological subtypes of CBD may predict the risk of residual CBD stones or technical difficulty in CBD stone removal. Further studies with a large sample size and longer follow-up durations are warranted to examine the usefulness of the newly identified morphological subtypes of CBD in predicting the outcomes of ERCP for CBD stone removal.展开更多
文摘Current guidelines for treating asymptomatic common bile duct stones(CBDS)recommend stone removal,with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography(ERCP)being the first treatment choice.When deciding on ERCP treatment for asymptomatic CBDS,the risk of ERCP-related complications and outcome of natural history of asymptomatic CBDS should be compared.The incidence rate of ERCP-related complications,particularly of post-ERCP pancreatitis for asymptomatic CBDS,was reportedly higher than that of symptomatic CBDS,increasing the risk of ERCP-related complications for asymptomatic CBDS compared with that previously reported for biliopancreatic diseases.Although studies have reported short-to middle-term outcomes of natural history of asymptomatic CBDS,its long-term natural history is not well known.Till date,there are no prospective studies that determined whether ERCP has a better outcome than no treatment in patients with asymptomatic CBDS or not.No randomized controlled trial has evaluated the risk of early and late ERCP-related complications vs the risk of biliary complications in the wait-and-see approach,suggesting that a change is needed in our perspective on endoscopic treatment for asymptomatic CBDS.Further studies examining long-term complication risks of ERCP and wait-and-see groups for asymptomatic CBDS are warranted to discuss whether routine endoscopic treatment for asymptomatic CBDS is justified or not.
文摘BACKGROUND As the aging population grows worldwide,the rates of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)for common bile duct stones(CBDS)in older patients with a poor performance status(PS)have been increasing.However,the data on the safety and efficacy of ERCP for CBDS in patients with a PS score of 3 or 4 are lacking,with only a few studies having investigated this issue among patients with poor PS.AIM To examine the safety and efficacy of ERCP for CBDS in patients with a PS score of 3 or 4.METHODS This study utilized a retrospective multi-centered design of three institutions in Japan for 8 years to identify a total of 1343 patients with CBDS having native papillae who underwent therapeutic ERCP.As a result,1113 patients with a PS 0-2 and 230 patients with a PS 3-4 were included.One-to-one propensity-score matching was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of ERCP for CBDS between patients with a PS 0-2 and those with a PS 3-4.RESULTS The overall ERCP-related complication rates in all patients and propensity score-matched patients with a PS 0-2 and 3-4 were 9.0%(100/1113)and 7.0%(16/230;P=0.37),and 4.6%(9/196)and 6.6%(13/196;P=0.51),respectively.In the propensity score-matched patients,complications were significantly more severe in the group with a PS 3-4 than in the group with a PS 0-2 group(P=0.042).Risk factors for complications were indications of ERCP and absence of antibiotics in the multivariate analysis.Therapeutic success rates,including complete CBDS removal and permanent biliary stent placement,in propensity score-matched patients with a PS 0-2 and 3-4 were 97.4%(191/196)and 97.4%(191/196),respectively(P=1.0).CONCLUSION ERCP for CBDS can be effectively performed in patients with a PS 3 or 4.Nevertheless,the indication for ERCP in such patients should be carefully considered with prophylactic antibiotics.
文摘Prophylaxis is important for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)pancreatitis(PEP),which is the most common and serious complication of ERCP.Although the current guidelines include independent patient-and procedure-related risk factors for PEP and available PEP prophylactic measures,the synergistic effect of these risk factors on PEP should also be considered,given that patients often harbor multiple risk factors.Furthermore,a combination of prophylactic measures is often selected in clinical practice.However,established methods estimating the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP incidence are lacking,and evidence on the impact of combining prophylactic measures on PEP should be discussed.Selection of appropriate candidate patients for ERCP is also important to reduce the incidence of PEP associated with unnecessary ERCP.ERCP indications in patients with asymptomatic common bile duct stones(CBDSs)and in those with suspected CBDSs with no imaging-based evidence of stones are controversial.Further studies are warranted to predict the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP,determine the best prophylactic PEP measures,and identify appropriate candidates for ERCP in patients with asymptomatic CBDSs and those with suspected CBDSs.
文摘Stones in the common bile duct(CBD) are reported worldwide, and this condition is majorly managed through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP). CBD stone recurrence is an important issue after endoscopic stone removal. Therefore, it is essential to identify its risk factors to determine the necessity of regular follow-up in patients who underwent endoscopic removal of CBD stones. The authors identified that the S and polyline morphological subtypes of CBD were associated with increased stone recurrence. New morphological subtypes of CBD presented by the authors can be important risk predictors of recurrence after endoscopic stone removal. Furthermore, the new morphological subtypes of CBD may predict the risk of residual CBD stones or technical difficulty in CBD stone removal. Further studies with a large sample size and longer follow-up durations are warranted to examine the usefulness of the newly identified morphological subtypes of CBD in predicting the outcomes of ERCP for CBD stone removal.
