The mammalian target of rapamycin(mTOR)acts in two structurally and functionally distinct protein complexes,mTOR complex 1(mTORC1)and mTOR complex 2(mTORC2).Upon deregulation,activated mTOR signaling is associated wit...The mammalian target of rapamycin(mTOR)acts in two structurally and functionally distinct protein complexes,mTOR complex 1(mTORC1)and mTOR complex 2(mTORC2).Upon deregulation,activated mTOR signaling is associated with multiple processes involved in tumor growth and metastasis.Compared with mTORC1,much less is known about mTORC2 in cancer,mainly because of the unavailability of a selective inhibitor.However,existing data suggest that mTORC2 with its two distinct subunits Rictor and mSin1 might play a more important role than assumed so far.It is one of the key effectors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and stimulates cell growth,cell survival,metabolism,and cytoskeletal organization.It is not only implicated in tumor progression,metastasis,and the tumor microenvironment but also in resistance to therapy.Rictor,the central subunit of mTORC2,was found to be upregulated in different kinds of cancers and is associated with advanced tumor stages and a bad prognosis.Moreover,AKT,the main downstream regulator of mTORC2/Rictor,is one of the most highly activated proteins in cancer.Primary and secondary liver cancer are major problems for current cancer therapy due to the lack of specific medical treatment,emphasizing the need for further therapeutic options.This review,therefore,summarizes the role of mTORC2/Rictor in cancer,with special focus on primary liver cancer but also on liver metastases.展开更多
Liver transplantation for malignant disease has gained increasing attention as part of transplant oncology.Following the implementation of the Milan criteria,hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)was the first generally accept...Liver transplantation for malignant disease has gained increasing attention as part of transplant oncology.Following the implementation of the Milan criteria,hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)was the first generally accepted indication for transplantation in patients with cancer.Subsequently,more liberal criteria for HCC have been developed,and research on this topic is still ongoing.The evident success of liver transplantation for HCC has led to the attempt to extend its indication to other malignancies.Regarding perihilar cholangiocarcinoma,more and more evidence supports the use of liver transplantation,especially after neoadjuvant therapy.In addition,some data also show a benefit for selected patients with very early stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a very rare but nonetheless established indication for liver transplantation in primary liver cancer.In contrast,patients with hepatic angiosarcoma are currently not considered to be optimal candidates.In secondary liver tumors,neuroendocrine cancer liver metastases are an accepted but comparability rare indication for liver transplantation.Recently,some evidence has been published supporting the use of liver transplantation even for colorectal liver metastases.This review summarizes the current evidence for liver transplantation for primary and secondary liver cancer.展开更多
BACKGROUND Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency is a rare genetic disease and a leading cause of inherited alterations in plasma protein metabolism(APPM).AIM To understand the prevalence,burden and progression of liver dise...BACKGROUND Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency is a rare genetic disease and a leading cause of inherited alterations in plasma protein metabolism(APPM).AIM To understand the prevalence,burden and progression of liver disease in patients with APPM including alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of anonymized patient-level claims data from a German health insurance provider(AOK PLUS).The APPM cohort comprised patients with APPM(identified using the German Modification of the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision[ICD-10-GM]code E88.0 between 01/01/2010-30/09/2020)and incident liver disease(ICD-10-GM codes K74,K70.2-3 and K71.7 between 01/01/2012-30/09/2020).The control cohort comprised patients without APPM but with incident liver disease.Outcomes were incidence/prevalence of liver disease in patients with APPM,demographics/baseline characteristics,diagnostic procedures,progression-free survival(PFS),disease progression and mortality.RESULTS Overall,2680 and 26299 patients were included in the APPM(fibrosis,96;cirrhosis,2584)and control(fibrosis,1444;cirrhosis,24855)cohorts,respectively.Per 100000 individuals,annual incidence and prevalence of APPM and liver disease was 10-15 and 36-51,respectively.In the APPM cohort,median survival was 4.7 years[95%confidence interval(CI):3.5-7.0]and 2.5 years(95%CI:2.3-2.8)in patients with fibrosis and cirrhosis,respectively.A higher proportion of patients in the APPM cohort experienced disease progression(92.0%)compared with the control cohort(67.2%).Median PFS was shorter in the APPM cohort(0.9 years,95%CI:0.7-1.1)compared with the control cohort(3.7 years,95%CI:3.6-3.8;P<0.001).Patients with cirrhosis in the control cohort had longer event-free survival for ascites,hepatic encephalopathy,hepatic failure and esophageal/gastric varices than patients with cirrhosis in the APPM cohort(P<0.001).Patients with fibrosis in the control cohort had longer event-free survival for ascites,cirrhosis,hepatic failure and esophageal/gastric varices than patients with fibrosis in the APPM cohort(P<0.001).In the APPM cohort,the most common diagnostic procedures within 12 mo after the first diagnosis of liver disease were imaging procedures(66.3%)and laboratory tests(51.0%).CONCLUSION Among patients with liver disease,those with APPM experience substantial burden and earlier liver disease progression than patients without APPM.展开更多
文摘The mammalian target of rapamycin(mTOR)acts in two structurally and functionally distinct protein complexes,mTOR complex 1(mTORC1)and mTOR complex 2(mTORC2).Upon deregulation,activated mTOR signaling is associated with multiple processes involved in tumor growth and metastasis.Compared with mTORC1,much less is known about mTORC2 in cancer,mainly because of the unavailability of a selective inhibitor.However,existing data suggest that mTORC2 with its two distinct subunits Rictor and mSin1 might play a more important role than assumed so far.It is one of the key effectors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and stimulates cell growth,cell survival,metabolism,and cytoskeletal organization.It is not only implicated in tumor progression,metastasis,and the tumor microenvironment but also in resistance to therapy.Rictor,the central subunit of mTORC2,was found to be upregulated in different kinds of cancers and is associated with advanced tumor stages and a bad prognosis.Moreover,AKT,the main downstream regulator of mTORC2/Rictor,is one of the most highly activated proteins in cancer.Primary and secondary liver cancer are major problems for current cancer therapy due to the lack of specific medical treatment,emphasizing the need for further therapeutic options.This review,therefore,summarizes the role of mTORC2/Rictor in cancer,with special focus on primary liver cancer but also on liver metastases.
文摘Liver transplantation for malignant disease has gained increasing attention as part of transplant oncology.Following the implementation of the Milan criteria,hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)was the first generally accepted indication for transplantation in patients with cancer.Subsequently,more liberal criteria for HCC have been developed,and research on this topic is still ongoing.The evident success of liver transplantation for HCC has led to the attempt to extend its indication to other malignancies.Regarding perihilar cholangiocarcinoma,more and more evidence supports the use of liver transplantation,especially after neoadjuvant therapy.In addition,some data also show a benefit for selected patients with very early stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a very rare but nonetheless established indication for liver transplantation in primary liver cancer.In contrast,patients with hepatic angiosarcoma are currently not considered to be optimal candidates.In secondary liver tumors,neuroendocrine cancer liver metastases are an accepted but comparability rare indication for liver transplantation.Recently,some evidence has been published supporting the use of liver transplantation even for colorectal liver metastases.This review summarizes the current evidence for liver transplantation for primary and secondary liver cancer.
文摘BACKGROUND Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency is a rare genetic disease and a leading cause of inherited alterations in plasma protein metabolism(APPM).AIM To understand the prevalence,burden and progression of liver disease in patients with APPM including alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of anonymized patient-level claims data from a German health insurance provider(AOK PLUS).The APPM cohort comprised patients with APPM(identified using the German Modification of the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision[ICD-10-GM]code E88.0 between 01/01/2010-30/09/2020)and incident liver disease(ICD-10-GM codes K74,K70.2-3 and K71.7 between 01/01/2012-30/09/2020).The control cohort comprised patients without APPM but with incident liver disease.Outcomes were incidence/prevalence of liver disease in patients with APPM,demographics/baseline characteristics,diagnostic procedures,progression-free survival(PFS),disease progression and mortality.RESULTS Overall,2680 and 26299 patients were included in the APPM(fibrosis,96;cirrhosis,2584)and control(fibrosis,1444;cirrhosis,24855)cohorts,respectively.Per 100000 individuals,annual incidence and prevalence of APPM and liver disease was 10-15 and 36-51,respectively.In the APPM cohort,median survival was 4.7 years[95%confidence interval(CI):3.5-7.0]and 2.5 years(95%CI:2.3-2.8)in patients with fibrosis and cirrhosis,respectively.A higher proportion of patients in the APPM cohort experienced disease progression(92.0%)compared with the control cohort(67.2%).Median PFS was shorter in the APPM cohort(0.9 years,95%CI:0.7-1.1)compared with the control cohort(3.7 years,95%CI:3.6-3.8;P<0.001).Patients with cirrhosis in the control cohort had longer event-free survival for ascites,hepatic encephalopathy,hepatic failure and esophageal/gastric varices than patients with cirrhosis in the APPM cohort(P<0.001).Patients with fibrosis in the control cohort had longer event-free survival for ascites,cirrhosis,hepatic failure and esophageal/gastric varices than patients with fibrosis in the APPM cohort(P<0.001).In the APPM cohort,the most common diagnostic procedures within 12 mo after the first diagnosis of liver disease were imaging procedures(66.3%)and laboratory tests(51.0%).CONCLUSION Among patients with liver disease,those with APPM experience substantial burden and earlier liver disease progression than patients without APPM.
