AIM:To investigate changes on magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) which occur with intracavitary Gliadel wafer placement in patients with glioblastoma multiforme(GBM).METHODS:This retrospective Health Insurance Portabilit...AIM:To investigate changes on magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) which occur with intracavitary Gliadel wafer placement in patients with glioblastoma multiforme(GBM).METHODS:This retrospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board,with a waiver of informed consent.A total of eight patients aged 29-67 years with GBM underwent Gliadel wafer placement.T2-weighted/FLAIR images and post-contrast T1-weighted images both before and after wafer placement were retrospectively reviewed in consensus to determine changes in the following parameters:appearance of the pericavitary tissue,pattern of tumor recurrence or progression and appearance of the Gliade lwafer itself.RESULTS:Five out of the eight patients had a progressive increase in enhancement and pericavitary T2/FLAIR hyperintensity within the first 2 mo and a subsequent decrease in these MRI findings.None ofthese patients had tumor recurrence within the first6 mo.Three out of the eight patients demonstrated aprogressive increase in enhancement and pericavitary T2 hyperintensity,which continued after the first 6 mo,and were subsequently diagnosed with true tumor progression.There was no increase in distant/nonlocal tumor recurrence.The Gliadel wafer appearance changed over time.CONCLUSION:Pseudoprogression is common after intracavitary Gliadel wafer placement and thus care should be taken before diagnosing tumor progression or recurrence within the first 2 mo.展开更多
文摘AIM:To investigate changes on magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) which occur with intracavitary Gliadel wafer placement in patients with glioblastoma multiforme(GBM).METHODS:This retrospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board,with a waiver of informed consent.A total of eight patients aged 29-67 years with GBM underwent Gliadel wafer placement.T2-weighted/FLAIR images and post-contrast T1-weighted images both before and after wafer placement were retrospectively reviewed in consensus to determine changes in the following parameters:appearance of the pericavitary tissue,pattern of tumor recurrence or progression and appearance of the Gliade lwafer itself.RESULTS:Five out of the eight patients had a progressive increase in enhancement and pericavitary T2/FLAIR hyperintensity within the first 2 mo and a subsequent decrease in these MRI findings.None ofthese patients had tumor recurrence within the first6 mo.Three out of the eight patients demonstrated aprogressive increase in enhancement and pericavitary T2 hyperintensity,which continued after the first 6 mo,and were subsequently diagnosed with true tumor progression.There was no increase in distant/nonlocal tumor recurrence.The Gliadel wafer appearance changed over time.CONCLUSION:Pseudoprogression is common after intracavitary Gliadel wafer placement and thus care should be taken before diagnosing tumor progression or recurrence within the first 2 mo.
