Objective: to explore the practical application of risk control in the nursing management of the infection department. Methods: in this study, 130 patients treated in the infection department of our hospital from earl...Objective: to explore the practical application of risk control in the nursing management of the infection department. Methods: in this study, 130 patients treated in the infection department of our hospital from early 2020 to December 2020 were selected, and the selected patients were randomly divided into two groups, one is the reference group, with 65 patients in each group. For routine care of patients in the reference group, and patient risk control management in the study group, the effectiveness of the two care models was compared. Results: the incidence of disputes and accidents in the reference group was (15.38%) (16.92%), the incidence of disputes and accidents was (4.62%) and (3.08%) respectively, including the dispute event X2 of 4.188, P value of 0.041, contingency (2 of 6.923, P value of 0.009, and the two groups were significantly different, (P <0.05).The nursing scores of the reference and study groups were (6.34 ± 2.32) and (9.85 ± 1.96), with a t-value of 9.318 and a p-value of 0, with a significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05).The environmental scores of the reference and study groups were (6.14 ± 1.73) and (9.68 ± 2.96), with t-value of 8.324, p-value of 0, and significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05).In addition, the reference group had 19 patients after routine care, 25 patients, 67.7%, 30 patients after routine care, 33 care, 96.9%, X2,19.07, P value 0, significant difference between the two groups, (P <0.05). Conclusion: the application of risk control management in nursing management is recommended.展开更多
文摘Objective: to explore the practical application of risk control in the nursing management of the infection department. Methods: in this study, 130 patients treated in the infection department of our hospital from early 2020 to December 2020 were selected, and the selected patients were randomly divided into two groups, one is the reference group, with 65 patients in each group. For routine care of patients in the reference group, and patient risk control management in the study group, the effectiveness of the two care models was compared. Results: the incidence of disputes and accidents in the reference group was (15.38%) (16.92%), the incidence of disputes and accidents was (4.62%) and (3.08%) respectively, including the dispute event X2 of 4.188, P value of 0.041, contingency (2 of 6.923, P value of 0.009, and the two groups were significantly different, (P <0.05).The nursing scores of the reference and study groups were (6.34 ± 2.32) and (9.85 ± 1.96), with a t-value of 9.318 and a p-value of 0, with a significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05).The environmental scores of the reference and study groups were (6.14 ± 1.73) and (9.68 ± 2.96), with t-value of 8.324, p-value of 0, and significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05).In addition, the reference group had 19 patients after routine care, 25 patients, 67.7%, 30 patients after routine care, 33 care, 96.9%, X2,19.07, P value 0, significant difference between the two groups, (P <0.05). Conclusion: the application of risk control management in nursing management is recommended.
