Objective:to observe the clinical effica-cy of Shenling Baizhu Powder(SLBZP)combined with a subconjunctival injection of triamcinolone acetonide(TA)in treating macular edema(ME)induced by retinal vein occlusion(RVO).M...Objective:to observe the clinical effica-cy of Shenling Baizhu Powder(SLBZP)combined with a subconjunctival injection of triamcinolone acetonide(TA)in treating macular edema(ME)induced by retinal vein occlusion(RVO).Method:there were 62 patients(62 eyes)with ME induced by RVO that were selected and divided into two groups in accordance with the ran-dom number table.Each group had 31 eyes.Group one,the control group,was treated with a single subconjunc-tival injection of TA;group two,the observation group,was treated with a single subconjunctival injection of TA(20 mg/0.5 mL)per eye and one month of SLBZP.To evaluate the clinical efficacy,both groups were checked(3×)with the best corrected-visual acuity(BCVA),cen-ter macular thickness(CMT),and intraocular pressure(IOP).The checks were before treatment,one month af-ter injection,and three months after injection.Results:there were 26 eyes(83.87%)in the observation group,and 17 eyes(54.84%)in the control group in which the BCVA was significantly improved.The ME obviously de-creased in 27 eyes(87.10%)the observation group and in 19 eyes(61.29%)the control group.The clinical effica-cy of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:as one method to treat ME induced by RVO,SLBZP combined with subconjunctival injection of TA is significantly more effective than a single subconjunctival injection of TA.Besides,the SLBZP had less side-effects.Based on the above,this method deserves in-depth research.展开更多
文摘Objective:to observe the clinical effica-cy of Shenling Baizhu Powder(SLBZP)combined with a subconjunctival injection of triamcinolone acetonide(TA)in treating macular edema(ME)induced by retinal vein occlusion(RVO).Method:there were 62 patients(62 eyes)with ME induced by RVO that were selected and divided into two groups in accordance with the ran-dom number table.Each group had 31 eyes.Group one,the control group,was treated with a single subconjunc-tival injection of TA;group two,the observation group,was treated with a single subconjunctival injection of TA(20 mg/0.5 mL)per eye and one month of SLBZP.To evaluate the clinical efficacy,both groups were checked(3×)with the best corrected-visual acuity(BCVA),cen-ter macular thickness(CMT),and intraocular pressure(IOP).The checks were before treatment,one month af-ter injection,and three months after injection.Results:there were 26 eyes(83.87%)in the observation group,and 17 eyes(54.84%)in the control group in which the BCVA was significantly improved.The ME obviously de-creased in 27 eyes(87.10%)the observation group and in 19 eyes(61.29%)the control group.The clinical effica-cy of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:as one method to treat ME induced by RVO,SLBZP combined with subconjunctival injection of TA is significantly more effective than a single subconjunctival injection of TA.Besides,the SLBZP had less side-effects.Based on the above,this method deserves in-depth research.
