AIM To measure single baseline deep posterior compartment pressure in tibial fracture complicated by acute compartment syndrome(ACS) and to correlate it with functional outcome.METHODS Thirty-two tibial fractures with...AIM To measure single baseline deep posterior compartment pressure in tibial fracture complicated by acute compartment syndrome(ACS) and to correlate it with functional outcome.METHODS Thirty-two tibial fractures with ACS were evaluated clinically and the deep posterior compartment pressure was measured. Urgent fasciotomy was needed in 30 patients. Definite surgical fixation was performed either primarily or once fasciotomy wound was healthy. The patients were followed up at 3 mo, 6 mo and one year. At one year, the functional outcome [lower extremity functional scale(LEFS)] and complications were assessed.RESULTS Three limbs were amputated. In remaining 29 patients, the average times for clinical and radiological union were 25.2 ± 10.9 wk(10 to 54 wk) and 23.8 ± 9.2 wk(12 to 52 wk) respectively. Nine patients had delayed union and 2 had nonunion who needed bone grafting to augment healing. Most common complaint at follow up was ankle stiffness(76%) that caused difficulty in walking,running and squatting. Of 21 patients who had paralysis at diagnosis, 13(62%) did not recover and additional five patients developed paralysis at follow-up. On LEFS evaluation, there were 14 patients(48.3%) with severe disability, 10 patients(34.5%) with moderate disability and 5 patients(17.2%) with minimal disability. The mean pressures in patients with minimal disability, moderate disability and severe disability were 37.8, 48.4 and 58.79 mmH g respectively(P < 0.001).CONCLUSION ACS in tibial fractures causes severe functional disability in majority of patients. These patients are prone for delayed union and nonunion; however, long term disability is mainly because of severe soft tissue contracture. Intracompartmental pressure(ICP) correlates with functional disability; patients with relatively high ICP are prone for poor functional outcome.展开更多
BACKGROUND Timely intervention in hip fracture is essential to decrease the risks of perioperative morbidity and mortality.However,limitations of the resources,risk of disease transmission and redirection of medical a...BACKGROUND Timely intervention in hip fracture is essential to decrease the risks of perioperative morbidity and mortality.However,limitations of the resources,risk of disease transmission and redirection of medical attention to a more severe infective health problem during coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic period have affected the quality of care even in a surgical emergency.AIM To compare the 30-d mortality rate and complications of hip fracture patients treated during COVID-19 pandemic and pre-pandemic times.METHODS The search of electronic databases on 1st August 2020 revealed 45 studies related to mortality of hip fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic and pre-pandemic times.After careful screening,eight studies were eligible for quantitative and qualitative analysis of data.RESULTS The pooled data of eight studies(n=1586)revealed no significant difference in 30-d mortality rate between the hip fracture patients treated during the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods[9.63%vs 6.33%;odds ratio(OR),0.62;95%CI,0.33,1.17;P=0.14].Even the 30-d mortality rate was not different between COVID-19 non-infected patients who were treated during the pandemic time,and all hip fracture patients treated during the pre-pandemic period(OR,1.03;95%CI,0.61,1.75;P=0.91).A significant difference in mortality rate was observed between COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients(OR,6.99;95%CI,3.45,14.16;P<0.00001).There was no difference in the duration of hospital stay(OR,-1.52,95%CI,-3.85,0.81;P=0.20),overall complications(OR,1.62;P=0.15)and incidence of pulmonary complications(OR,1.46;P=0.38)in these two-time frames.Nevertheless,the preoperative morbidity was more severe,and there was less use of general anesthesia during the pandemic time.CONCLUSION There was no difference in 30-d mortality rate between hip fracture patients treated during the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods.However,the mortality risk was higher in COVID-19 positive patients compared to COVID-19 negative patients.There was no difference in time to surgery,complications and hospitalization time between these two time periods.展开更多
文摘AIM To measure single baseline deep posterior compartment pressure in tibial fracture complicated by acute compartment syndrome(ACS) and to correlate it with functional outcome.METHODS Thirty-two tibial fractures with ACS were evaluated clinically and the deep posterior compartment pressure was measured. Urgent fasciotomy was needed in 30 patients. Definite surgical fixation was performed either primarily or once fasciotomy wound was healthy. The patients were followed up at 3 mo, 6 mo and one year. At one year, the functional outcome [lower extremity functional scale(LEFS)] and complications were assessed.RESULTS Three limbs were amputated. In remaining 29 patients, the average times for clinical and radiological union were 25.2 ± 10.9 wk(10 to 54 wk) and 23.8 ± 9.2 wk(12 to 52 wk) respectively. Nine patients had delayed union and 2 had nonunion who needed bone grafting to augment healing. Most common complaint at follow up was ankle stiffness(76%) that caused difficulty in walking,running and squatting. Of 21 patients who had paralysis at diagnosis, 13(62%) did not recover and additional five patients developed paralysis at follow-up. On LEFS evaluation, there were 14 patients(48.3%) with severe disability, 10 patients(34.5%) with moderate disability and 5 patients(17.2%) with minimal disability. The mean pressures in patients with minimal disability, moderate disability and severe disability were 37.8, 48.4 and 58.79 mmH g respectively(P < 0.001).CONCLUSION ACS in tibial fractures causes severe functional disability in majority of patients. These patients are prone for delayed union and nonunion; however, long term disability is mainly because of severe soft tissue contracture. Intracompartmental pressure(ICP) correlates with functional disability; patients with relatively high ICP are prone for poor functional outcome.
文摘BACKGROUND Timely intervention in hip fracture is essential to decrease the risks of perioperative morbidity and mortality.However,limitations of the resources,risk of disease transmission and redirection of medical attention to a more severe infective health problem during coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic period have affected the quality of care even in a surgical emergency.AIM To compare the 30-d mortality rate and complications of hip fracture patients treated during COVID-19 pandemic and pre-pandemic times.METHODS The search of electronic databases on 1st August 2020 revealed 45 studies related to mortality of hip fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic and pre-pandemic times.After careful screening,eight studies were eligible for quantitative and qualitative analysis of data.RESULTS The pooled data of eight studies(n=1586)revealed no significant difference in 30-d mortality rate between the hip fracture patients treated during the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods[9.63%vs 6.33%;odds ratio(OR),0.62;95%CI,0.33,1.17;P=0.14].Even the 30-d mortality rate was not different between COVID-19 non-infected patients who were treated during the pandemic time,and all hip fracture patients treated during the pre-pandemic period(OR,1.03;95%CI,0.61,1.75;P=0.91).A significant difference in mortality rate was observed between COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients(OR,6.99;95%CI,3.45,14.16;P<0.00001).There was no difference in the duration of hospital stay(OR,-1.52,95%CI,-3.85,0.81;P=0.20),overall complications(OR,1.62;P=0.15)and incidence of pulmonary complications(OR,1.46;P=0.38)in these two-time frames.Nevertheless,the preoperative morbidity was more severe,and there was less use of general anesthesia during the pandemic time.CONCLUSION There was no difference in 30-d mortality rate between hip fracture patients treated during the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods.However,the mortality risk was higher in COVID-19 positive patients compared to COVID-19 negative patients.There was no difference in time to surgery,complications and hospitalization time between these two time periods.
