BACKGROUND Obstructed defecation syndrome(ODS)is a subtype of constipation that is consi-dered one of the major pelvic floor dysfunctions affecting the aging population,particularly women over 50 seeking medical care....BACKGROUND Obstructed defecation syndrome(ODS)is a subtype of constipation that is consi-dered one of the major pelvic floor dysfunctions affecting the aging population,particularly women over 50 seeking medical care.The condition is characterized by the urge to defecate but an impaired ability to expel the fecal bolus.ODS is associated with various anorectal abnormalities,which are not always apparent during a standard physical examination,requiring specialized imaging techniques for proper diagnosis.AIM To study the distribution of causes of ODS in patients with chronic constipation by magnetic resonance defecography(MRD).METHODS This observational study evaluated the causes of ODS in 57 patients with chronic constipation who presented to Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University between July 2020 and June 2021.After obtaining institutional review board approval and informed consent,patients underwent history taking,physical exams,and relevant investigations.ODS was diagnosed using Rome III criteria,with colonoscopy ruling out organic causes.Standard MRD was performed in different phases,and images were analyzed by expert radiologists and reported in a stan-dardized format.RESULTS Pelvic floor descent and anorectal junction descent were the most frequent findings,each present in 94.7%of cases.Rectocele was observed in 78.9%of patients,while vaginal or uterine prolapse was seen in 59.4%of females.Less common abnormalities included paradoxical contraction(7%),and there were no cases of sigmoidocele.Functional measurements showed significant differences in pelvic floor dynamics between rest and defecation,particularly in the H-line,M-line,and descent of pelvic organs(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Pelvic floor descent and anorectal descent were the most common findings in patients suffering from ODS,fo-llowed by rectocele.Younger females(<30 years)were most affected.展开更多
Background: Fast track surgery is an evidence-based multidisciplinary approach. The underlying principle is to enable patients to recover from surgery and leave the hospital sooner by minimizing the stress responses o...Background: Fast track surgery is an evidence-based multidisciplinary approach. The underlying principle is to enable patients to recover from surgery and leave the hospital sooner by minimizing the stress responses on the body during surgery. Our aim was to compare the outcome of fast-track protocol and conventional methods in colorectal surgery. Method: It was an observational cross-sectional study carried out at the Department of Surgery in different tertiary level hospitals, Dhaka Bangladesh during the period January 2014 to December 2017. Among this population, 50 patients were placed in the fast-track program (Group A) from January 2014 to December 2015 and 50 patients were in the conventional method (Group B), from January 2016 to December 2017. The fast-track patients were selected after receiving ethical approval from the Bangladesh College of Physician & Surgeons. Data analysis was done using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) for windows version 20. Results: The average age of the patients was 45.24 ± 16.65 years (range: 11 - 70 years) in the fast track group (Group A) and 43.24 ± 17.76 years in the conventional method (Group B). The majority were female between two groups, with 56% in group A and 52% in group B. General and surgical complications occurred in 9 (18%) patients and 11 (22%) patients respectively in group A. On the other hand in group B general and surgical complications occurred in 10 (20%) patients and 13 (26%) patients respectively. The average hospital stay was 9.24 ± 5.99 days in group A and the average hospital stay was 10.10 ± 6.04 days in group B. Conclusion: Making the decision to adopt fast-track surgery will challenge current traditional practice for all members of the multidisciplinary team across the whole local health community.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Obstructed defecation syndrome(ODS)is a subtype of constipation that is consi-dered one of the major pelvic floor dysfunctions affecting the aging population,particularly women over 50 seeking medical care.The condition is characterized by the urge to defecate but an impaired ability to expel the fecal bolus.ODS is associated with various anorectal abnormalities,which are not always apparent during a standard physical examination,requiring specialized imaging techniques for proper diagnosis.AIM To study the distribution of causes of ODS in patients with chronic constipation by magnetic resonance defecography(MRD).METHODS This observational study evaluated the causes of ODS in 57 patients with chronic constipation who presented to Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University between July 2020 and June 2021.After obtaining institutional review board approval and informed consent,patients underwent history taking,physical exams,and relevant investigations.ODS was diagnosed using Rome III criteria,with colonoscopy ruling out organic causes.Standard MRD was performed in different phases,and images were analyzed by expert radiologists and reported in a stan-dardized format.RESULTS Pelvic floor descent and anorectal junction descent were the most frequent findings,each present in 94.7%of cases.Rectocele was observed in 78.9%of patients,while vaginal or uterine prolapse was seen in 59.4%of females.Less common abnormalities included paradoxical contraction(7%),and there were no cases of sigmoidocele.Functional measurements showed significant differences in pelvic floor dynamics between rest and defecation,particularly in the H-line,M-line,and descent of pelvic organs(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Pelvic floor descent and anorectal descent were the most common findings in patients suffering from ODS,fo-llowed by rectocele.Younger females(<30 years)were most affected.
文摘Background: Fast track surgery is an evidence-based multidisciplinary approach. The underlying principle is to enable patients to recover from surgery and leave the hospital sooner by minimizing the stress responses on the body during surgery. Our aim was to compare the outcome of fast-track protocol and conventional methods in colorectal surgery. Method: It was an observational cross-sectional study carried out at the Department of Surgery in different tertiary level hospitals, Dhaka Bangladesh during the period January 2014 to December 2017. Among this population, 50 patients were placed in the fast-track program (Group A) from January 2014 to December 2015 and 50 patients were in the conventional method (Group B), from January 2016 to December 2017. The fast-track patients were selected after receiving ethical approval from the Bangladesh College of Physician & Surgeons. Data analysis was done using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) for windows version 20. Results: The average age of the patients was 45.24 ± 16.65 years (range: 11 - 70 years) in the fast track group (Group A) and 43.24 ± 17.76 years in the conventional method (Group B). The majority were female between two groups, with 56% in group A and 52% in group B. General and surgical complications occurred in 9 (18%) patients and 11 (22%) patients respectively in group A. On the other hand in group B general and surgical complications occurred in 10 (20%) patients and 13 (26%) patients respectively. The average hospital stay was 9.24 ± 5.99 days in group A and the average hospital stay was 10.10 ± 6.04 days in group B. Conclusion: Making the decision to adopt fast-track surgery will challenge current traditional practice for all members of the multidisciplinary team across the whole local health community.
