<span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study aimed to evaluate the influence of measuring the length of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) to compare the MCL burden when the knee joint is placed und...<span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study aimed to evaluate the influence of measuring the length of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) to compare the MCL burden when the knee joint is placed under valgus stress in the open and closed and closed kinetic chain.</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Two examiners conducted the examination. The MCL length was measured using ultrasonography. Two subjects were measured in unload bearing and load-bearing positions, with and without valgus stress test at the knee joint extension and 30<span style="white-space:nowrap;">°</span> flexion, under eight different measurement conditions. The MCL of the subject was delineated in the longitudinal direction using an ultrasound system. The attachment points of the medial femoral and tibial condyle of the MCL were identified, and the ligament length was measured. The MCL rate before and after the valgus stress test in the loading and unloading positions was calculated.</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The MCL length increased by an average of 8.9% when the external stress test was performed in the non-weight bearing and knee extension positions and by an average of 17.0% when external stress was applied in the non-weight bearing and knee flexion positions. The MCL length increased by an average of 12.2% when the external stress test was performed in the load-bearing and knee extension positions and an average of 8.9% when the valgus stress test was applied in load-bearing and knee flexion positions. In conclusion, the effect of valgus stress on the MCL differs between load-bearing and non-load-bearing positions. It is considered that the dynamic stabilization mechanism works in the knee joint flexion position in the load position and works simultaneously as the static stabilization mechanism, which limits the knee joint valgus and reduces the extension rate of MCL. Therefore, this study reconsiders the shifting of traditional therapy from open kinetic chain to close kinetic chain.</span>展开更多
文摘<span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study aimed to evaluate the influence of measuring the length of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) to compare the MCL burden when the knee joint is placed under valgus stress in the open and closed and closed kinetic chain.</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Two examiners conducted the examination. The MCL length was measured using ultrasonography. Two subjects were measured in unload bearing and load-bearing positions, with and without valgus stress test at the knee joint extension and 30<span style="white-space:nowrap;">°</span> flexion, under eight different measurement conditions. The MCL of the subject was delineated in the longitudinal direction using an ultrasound system. The attachment points of the medial femoral and tibial condyle of the MCL were identified, and the ligament length was measured. The MCL rate before and after the valgus stress test in the loading and unloading positions was calculated.</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The MCL length increased by an average of 8.9% when the external stress test was performed in the non-weight bearing and knee extension positions and by an average of 17.0% when external stress was applied in the non-weight bearing and knee flexion positions. The MCL length increased by an average of 12.2% when the external stress test was performed in the load-bearing and knee extension positions and an average of 8.9% when the valgus stress test was applied in load-bearing and knee flexion positions. In conclusion, the effect of valgus stress on the MCL differs between load-bearing and non-load-bearing positions. It is considered that the dynamic stabilization mechanism works in the knee joint flexion position in the load position and works simultaneously as the static stabilization mechanism, which limits the knee joint valgus and reduces the extension rate of MCL. Therefore, this study reconsiders the shifting of traditional therapy from open kinetic chain to close kinetic chain.</span>
