Background:Minimally invasive surgery(MIS)is the technique of choice in selected patients for the treatment of liver tumors.The robotic approach is considered today the natural evolution of MIS.The application of the ...Background:Minimally invasive surgery(MIS)is the technique of choice in selected patients for the treatment of liver tumors.The robotic approach is considered today the natural evolution of MIS.The application of the robotic technique in liver transplantation(LT)has been recently evaluated,especially in the living donation.The aim of this paper is to review the current role of the MIS and robotic donor hepatectomy in the literature and to evaluate the possible future implication in the transplant field.Methods:We conducted a narrative review using PubMed and Google Scholar for reports published so far,using the following keywords:minimally invasive liver surgery,laparoscopic liver surgery,robotic liver surgery,robotic living donation,laparoscopic donor hepatectomy and robotic donor hepatectomy.Results:Several advantages have been claimed in favor of robotic surgery:three-dimensional(3-D)imaging with stable and high-definition view;a more rapid learning curve than the laparoscopic one;the lack of hand tremors and the freedom of movements.Compared to open surgery,the benefits showed in the studies evaluating the robotic approach in the living donation are:less postoperative pain,the shorter period before returning to normal activity despite sustaining longer operation time.Furthermore,the 3-D and magnification view makes the technique excellent in distinguishing the right plane of transection,vascular and biliary anatomy,associated with high precision of the movements and a better bleeding control(essential for donor safety)and lower rate of vascular injury.Conclusions:The current literature does not fully support the superiority of the robotic approach versus laparoscopic or open method in living donor hepatectomy.Robotic donor hepatectomy performed by teams with high expertise and in properly selected living donors is safe and feasible.However,further data are necessary to evaluate properly the role of robotic surgery in the field of living donation.展开更多
We read with great interest the published article of Cheung et al.(1)on Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition.The authors provided a comprehensive review and critical evaluation of the three main locoregional ablation(L...We read with great interest the published article of Cheung et al.(1)on Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition.The authors provided a comprehensive review and critical evaluation of the three main locoregional ablation(LRA)techniques for liver cancer:radiofrequency(RFA),microwave(MWA),and high-intensity focused ultrasound ablations(HIFU).The focus of the paper is on their application to patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)in the context of end-stage liver disease.展开更多
Despite a significant increase in utilization over the past decade,the number of donation after circulatory death(DCD)organs that are procured and transplanted in the United States(US)remains well below its potential....Despite a significant increase in utilization over the past decade,the number of donation after circulatory death(DCD)organs that are procured and transplanted in the United States(US)remains well below its potential.There is still room for expansion,as utilizing DCD organs to the fullest extent is currently the most viable solution to the persistent mismatch between supply and demand in transplantation.We convened a multidisciplinary transplantation summit to examine various aspects of DCD,with faculty members from around the world with clinical and academic interest in DCD donation and transplantation,including abdominal and cardiothoracic surgeons,organ procurement organization directors,hepatologists,and gastroenterologists.The conference focused on identifying barriers to DCD organ utilization and strategies to overcome these barriers.We divide the barriers to DCD utilization into three mains categories:(Ⅰ)policy and process variation;(II)logistical and transportation challenges;and(Ⅲ)higher risk perceptions related to DCD outcomes.For each barrier,we proposed a variety of solutions,providing an overview of the status of DCD donation in the US and suggestions on how to increase the use of DCD.There is a specific focus on ex situ machine perfusion,normothermic regional perfusion,and other opportunities to expand DCD utilization without negatively impacting recipient outcomes.展开更多
文摘Background:Minimally invasive surgery(MIS)is the technique of choice in selected patients for the treatment of liver tumors.The robotic approach is considered today the natural evolution of MIS.The application of the robotic technique in liver transplantation(LT)has been recently evaluated,especially in the living donation.The aim of this paper is to review the current role of the MIS and robotic donor hepatectomy in the literature and to evaluate the possible future implication in the transplant field.Methods:We conducted a narrative review using PubMed and Google Scholar for reports published so far,using the following keywords:minimally invasive liver surgery,laparoscopic liver surgery,robotic liver surgery,robotic living donation,laparoscopic donor hepatectomy and robotic donor hepatectomy.Results:Several advantages have been claimed in favor of robotic surgery:three-dimensional(3-D)imaging with stable and high-definition view;a more rapid learning curve than the laparoscopic one;the lack of hand tremors and the freedom of movements.Compared to open surgery,the benefits showed in the studies evaluating the robotic approach in the living donation are:less postoperative pain,the shorter period before returning to normal activity despite sustaining longer operation time.Furthermore,the 3-D and magnification view makes the technique excellent in distinguishing the right plane of transection,vascular and biliary anatomy,associated with high precision of the movements and a better bleeding control(essential for donor safety)and lower rate of vascular injury.Conclusions:The current literature does not fully support the superiority of the robotic approach versus laparoscopic or open method in living donor hepatectomy.Robotic donor hepatectomy performed by teams with high expertise and in properly selected living donors is safe and feasible.However,further data are necessary to evaluate properly the role of robotic surgery in the field of living donation.
文摘We read with great interest the published article of Cheung et al.(1)on Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition.The authors provided a comprehensive review and critical evaluation of the three main locoregional ablation(LRA)techniques for liver cancer:radiofrequency(RFA),microwave(MWA),and high-intensity focused ultrasound ablations(HIFU).The focus of the paper is on their application to patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)in the context of end-stage liver disease.
文摘Despite a significant increase in utilization over the past decade,the number of donation after circulatory death(DCD)organs that are procured and transplanted in the United States(US)remains well below its potential.There is still room for expansion,as utilizing DCD organs to the fullest extent is currently the most viable solution to the persistent mismatch between supply and demand in transplantation.We convened a multidisciplinary transplantation summit to examine various aspects of DCD,with faculty members from around the world with clinical and academic interest in DCD donation and transplantation,including abdominal and cardiothoracic surgeons,organ procurement organization directors,hepatologists,and gastroenterologists.The conference focused on identifying barriers to DCD organ utilization and strategies to overcome these barriers.We divide the barriers to DCD utilization into three mains categories:(Ⅰ)policy and process variation;(II)logistical and transportation challenges;and(Ⅲ)higher risk perceptions related to DCD outcomes.For each barrier,we proposed a variety of solutions,providing an overview of the status of DCD donation in the US and suggestions on how to increase the use of DCD.There is a specific focus on ex situ machine perfusion,normothermic regional perfusion,and other opportunities to expand DCD utilization without negatively impacting recipient outcomes.
