BACKGROUND Large appendiceal orifice polyps are traditionally treated surgically.Recently,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)have been utilized as alternative resection technique...BACKGROUND Large appendiceal orifice polyps are traditionally treated surgically.Recently,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)have been utilized as alternative resection techniques.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection techniques for the management of large appendiceal orifice polyps.METHODS This was a retrospective observational study conducted to assess the feasibility and safety of EMR and ESD for large appendiceal orifice polyps.This project was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board.Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of appendiceal orifice polyps≥1 cm from 2015 to 2022 at a tertiary referral endoscopy center in the United States were enrolled.The main outcomes of this study included en bloc resection,R0 resection,post resection adverse events,and polyp recurrence.RESULTS A total of 19 patients were identified.Most patients were female(53%)and Caucasian(95%).The mean age was 63.3±10.8 years,and the average body mass index was 28.8±6.4.The mean polyp size was 25.5±14.2 mm.74%of polyps were localized to the appendix(at or inside the appendiceal orifice)and the remaining extended into the cecum.68%of polyps occupied≥50%of the appendiceal orifice circumference.The mean procedure duration was 61.6±37.9 minutes.Polyps were resected via endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures in 5,6,and 8 patients,respectively.Final pathology was remarkable for tubular adenoma(n=10)[one with high grade dysplasia],sessile serrated adenoma(n=7),and tubulovillous adenoma(n=2)[two with high grade dysplasia].En bloc resection was achieved in 84%with an 88%R0 resection rate.Despite the large polyp sizes and challenging procedures,89%(n=17)of patients were discharged on the same day as their procedure.Two patients were admitted for post-procedure observation for conservative pain management.Eight patients underwent repeat colonoscopy without evidence of residual or recurrent adenomatous polyps.CONCLUSION Our study highlights how endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures are all appropriate techniques with minimal adverse effects,further validating the utility of endoscopic procedures in the management of large appendiceal polyps.展开更多
BACKGROUND Among patients with cirrhosis and pre-malignant or early malignant mucosal lesions,surgical intervention carries a much higher bleeding risk.When such lesions are discovered,endoscopic submucosal dissection...BACKGROUND Among patients with cirrhosis and pre-malignant or early malignant mucosal lesions,surgical intervention carries a much higher bleeding risk.When such lesions are discovered,endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)may offer curative therapy with lower risks than surgery and improved outcomes compared to traditional endoscopic resection.AIM To evaluate the outcomes of ESD in patients with cirrhosis.METHODS Patients with cirrhosis undergoing ESD between July 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively matched in 1:2 fashion to controls based on lesion location,size,and anticoagulation use.Procedural outcomes were compared between groups.RESULTS A total of 64 Lesions from 59 patients were included(16 cirrhosis,43 control).There were no differences in patient or lesion characteristics between groups.En bloc and curative resection was achieved in 84.21%,78.94%of the cirrhosis group and 88.89%,68.89%of controls,respectively,with no significant differences.Cirrhotic patients had significantly higher rates of intra-procedural coagulation grasper use for control of bleeding(47.37%vs 20%;P=0.02).There were otherwise no significant differences in adverse event rates.In the 29 patients with follow up,we found higher rates of recurrence in the cirrhosis group compared to controls(40%vs 5.26%;P=0.019),however this effect did not persist on multivariable analysis controlling for known confounders.CONCLUSION ESD may be safe and effective in patients with cirrhosis.Most procedure related outcomes were not significantly different between groups.Intra-procedural bleeding requiring use of the coagulation grasper use was expectedly higher in the cirrhosis group given the known effects of liver disease on hemostasis.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Large appendiceal orifice polyps are traditionally treated surgically.Recently,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)have been utilized as alternative resection techniques.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection techniques for the management of large appendiceal orifice polyps.METHODS This was a retrospective observational study conducted to assess the feasibility and safety of EMR and ESD for large appendiceal orifice polyps.This project was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board.Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of appendiceal orifice polyps≥1 cm from 2015 to 2022 at a tertiary referral endoscopy center in the United States were enrolled.The main outcomes of this study included en bloc resection,R0 resection,post resection adverse events,and polyp recurrence.RESULTS A total of 19 patients were identified.Most patients were female(53%)and Caucasian(95%).The mean age was 63.3±10.8 years,and the average body mass index was 28.8±6.4.The mean polyp size was 25.5±14.2 mm.74%of polyps were localized to the appendix(at or inside the appendiceal orifice)and the remaining extended into the cecum.68%of polyps occupied≥50%of the appendiceal orifice circumference.The mean procedure duration was 61.6±37.9 minutes.Polyps were resected via endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures in 5,6,and 8 patients,respectively.Final pathology was remarkable for tubular adenoma(n=10)[one with high grade dysplasia],sessile serrated adenoma(n=7),and tubulovillous adenoma(n=2)[two with high grade dysplasia].En bloc resection was achieved in 84%with an 88%R0 resection rate.Despite the large polyp sizes and challenging procedures,89%(n=17)of patients were discharged on the same day as their procedure.Two patients were admitted for post-procedure observation for conservative pain management.Eight patients underwent repeat colonoscopy without evidence of residual or recurrent adenomatous polyps.CONCLUSION Our study highlights how endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures are all appropriate techniques with minimal adverse effects,further validating the utility of endoscopic procedures in the management of large appendiceal polyps.
基金reviewed and approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board.
文摘BACKGROUND Among patients with cirrhosis and pre-malignant or early malignant mucosal lesions,surgical intervention carries a much higher bleeding risk.When such lesions are discovered,endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)may offer curative therapy with lower risks than surgery and improved outcomes compared to traditional endoscopic resection.AIM To evaluate the outcomes of ESD in patients with cirrhosis.METHODS Patients with cirrhosis undergoing ESD between July 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively matched in 1:2 fashion to controls based on lesion location,size,and anticoagulation use.Procedural outcomes were compared between groups.RESULTS A total of 64 Lesions from 59 patients were included(16 cirrhosis,43 control).There were no differences in patient or lesion characteristics between groups.En bloc and curative resection was achieved in 84.21%,78.94%of the cirrhosis group and 88.89%,68.89%of controls,respectively,with no significant differences.Cirrhotic patients had significantly higher rates of intra-procedural coagulation grasper use for control of bleeding(47.37%vs 20%;P=0.02).There were otherwise no significant differences in adverse event rates.In the 29 patients with follow up,we found higher rates of recurrence in the cirrhosis group compared to controls(40%vs 5.26%;P=0.019),however this effect did not persist on multivariable analysis controlling for known confounders.CONCLUSION ESD may be safe and effective in patients with cirrhosis.Most procedure related outcomes were not significantly different between groups.Intra-procedural bleeding requiring use of the coagulation grasper use was expectedly higher in the cirrhosis group given the known effects of liver disease on hemostasis.
