期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Impact of tear film stability on corneal refractive power measurement and surgical planning for cataract
1
作者 Yuanfeng Jiang Xiteng Chen +9 位作者 Yichen Gao Nan Gao Huiyu Wang Yanwen Feng Meisa Li luning qin Fei Li Shaozhen Zhao Shaochong Bu Fang Tian 《Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research》 2025年第2期100-106,共7页
Purpose:This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the influence of tear film stability on corneal refractive power measurement and surgical planning in cataract patients.Methods:Participants were divided into tear... Purpose:This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the influence of tear film stability on corneal refractive power measurement and surgical planning in cataract patients.Methods:Participants were divided into tear film instability(tear film stability level 2)and control(level 0–1)groups based on Keratograph 5M results.Using IOL Master 700,two consecutive measurements were obtained with a 10-min interval.Parameters including standard keratometry(Kf,Ks and K),keratometric corneal astigmatism(KCA),total keratometry(TKf,TKs and TK)and total corneal astigmatism(TCA)were recorded.IOL power was calculated using SRK-T,SRK-T TK,Haigis,Haigis TK,Barrett Universal II,and Barrett Universal II TK formulas.Results:The results showed significantly higher differences between two measurements in Kf,K,KCA,TKf,TK,and TCA,as well as the vector variability of corneal astigmatism in the tear film instability group(all P<0.05).Of all formulas,only the SRK-T formula displayed significantly higher variability in IOL power calculations in the tear film instability group compared to the control group(P<0.05).Conclusions:This study highlights that tear film instability can lead to deviations in corneal refractive power and astigmatism measurements,contributing to increased prediction errors in IOL power calculation,particularly with the SRK-T formula. 展开更多
关键词 Tear film stability dry eye Cataract surgery Corneal refractive power IOL power calculation
原文传递
CASIA 2与IOLMaster 700测量眼前段参数的比较 被引量:1
2
作者 王抒阳 步绍翀 +5 位作者 蒋元丰 秦鲁宁 王婷婷 张敏 于宗 林松 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2022年第11期867-872,共6页
目的:比较新型扫频源眼前节相干光层析成像仪CASIA 2与扫频源光相干生物测量仪IOLMaster 700测量眼前段结构参数的差异性和一致性。方法:回顾性研究。选取2020年4—5月在天津医科大学眼科医院就诊的白内障患者95例(95眼),分别采用CASIA ... 目的:比较新型扫频源眼前节相干光层析成像仪CASIA 2与扫频源光相干生物测量仪IOLMaster 700测量眼前段结构参数的差异性和一致性。方法:回顾性研究。选取2020年4—5月在天津医科大学眼科医院就诊的白内障患者95例(95眼),分别采用CASIA 2和IOLMaster 700测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)、角膜曲率陡峭轴(Ks)、角膜曲率平坦轴(Kf)。采用配对样本t检验比较2种仪器对CCT、ACD、LT、Ks、Kf测量结果的差异性;采用Pearson检验分析各参数测量结果在2种仪器间的相关性;采用Bland-Altman法评价各参数测量结果在2种仪器之间的一致性。结果:CASIA 2和IOLMaster 700测量CCT、ACD、LT差异均有统计学意义(t=-11.94,P<0.001;t=8.52,P<0.001;t=-2.97,P=0.004);测量Ks、Kf差异无统计学意义;2种仪器间测量的CCT、ACD、LT、Ks、Kf均呈正相关(r=0.99、0.99、0.99、0.98、0.97,均P<0.001)。Bland-Altman一致性分析显示,2种仪器测量CCT、ACD、LT差值的均数分别为-7.516μm、0.043 mm、0.023 mm,95%一致性界限(LoA)分别为(-19.92,4.48)μm、(-0.055,0.139)mm、(-0.120,0.160)mm。2种仪器测量Ks、Kf差值的均数为0.028 D、0.061 D,95%LoA分别为(-0.65,0.77)D、(-0.52,0.58)D;在95%LoA外分别占了7.36%(7/95)、6.31%(6/95),一致性较差。结论:CASIA 2和IOL Master 700的眼前节参数测量结果存在一定差异,且一致性欠佳。 展开更多
关键词 眼前段参数 CASIA 2 IOLMaster 700 白内障
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部