Objective: to explore the plastic effect and clinical application of nasal tip plastic surgery. Methods: a total of 78 patients were selected in this study, who underwent nasal tip plastic surgery in our hospital from...Objective: to explore the plastic effect and clinical application of nasal tip plastic surgery. Methods: a total of 78 patients were selected in this study, who underwent nasal tip plastic surgery in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2022. They were randomly assigned into two groups according to the odd-even series method. The experimental group and the conventional group were treated with artificial dermis and silica gel nasal augmentation, respectively, to compare the surgical effects. Results: 97.44% of the patients in the experimental group had effective nasal tip plastic surgery, while only 84.62% of the patients in the conventional group had effective nasal tip plastic surgery, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After plastic surgery, the nasal tip protrusion, nasal length and nasal tip height in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group, and the statistical significance was established (P < 0.05). In the experimental group, 5.13% of the patients had complications after nasal tip plastic surgery, the total incidence rate was lower than 20.51% in the conventional group, and the statistical significance was established (P < 0.05). 97.44% of the patients in the experimental group were satisfied with the nasal tip plastic surgery, while only 82.05% of the patients in the conventional group were satisfied, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: in the process of nasal tip plastic surgery, the overall application effect of artificial dermis is better than that of silica gel nasal augmentation, which is more worthy of promotion and application in clinic.展开更多
文摘Objective: to explore the plastic effect and clinical application of nasal tip plastic surgery. Methods: a total of 78 patients were selected in this study, who underwent nasal tip plastic surgery in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2022. They were randomly assigned into two groups according to the odd-even series method. The experimental group and the conventional group were treated with artificial dermis and silica gel nasal augmentation, respectively, to compare the surgical effects. Results: 97.44% of the patients in the experimental group had effective nasal tip plastic surgery, while only 84.62% of the patients in the conventional group had effective nasal tip plastic surgery, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After plastic surgery, the nasal tip protrusion, nasal length and nasal tip height in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group, and the statistical significance was established (P < 0.05). In the experimental group, 5.13% of the patients had complications after nasal tip plastic surgery, the total incidence rate was lower than 20.51% in the conventional group, and the statistical significance was established (P < 0.05). 97.44% of the patients in the experimental group were satisfied with the nasal tip plastic surgery, while only 82.05% of the patients in the conventional group were satisfied, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: in the process of nasal tip plastic surgery, the overall application effect of artificial dermis is better than that of silica gel nasal augmentation, which is more worthy of promotion and application in clinic.
