Introduction. The aim of our study was to understand the motivations of outpatients who come to dermatological emergencies in a university hospital. Patients and method. This 6-week prospective study included outpatie...Introduction. The aim of our study was to understand the motivations of outpatients who come to dermatological emergencies in a university hospital. Patients and method. This 6-week prospective study included outpatients who came to the dermatology emergency unit. This consultation is proposed each morning (from 8 to 9), from Mondays to Fridays. A questionnaire was distributed to outpatients. They answered questions on the functioning of this consultation and their own symptoms. The consulting dermatologist answered questions on the referring physician, the really urgent characteristics of the disease and the diagnosis. Results. Patients were satisfied by the functioning of the consultation. Indeed, 59 p. 100 of outpatients thought that the timetable was convenient and 70 p. 100 that the delay before getting a consultation was rapid. 75 p. 100 felt they needed treatment rapidly. Nonetheless, 45 p. 100 did not think they had a serious disease. More than half of the outpatients were referred by their general practitioner; the others came spontaneously, or were referred by other departments or general emergencies. The most frequent diagnoses were cutaneous infections (27.6 p. 100), eczema (21 p. 100), then benign tumors, psoriasis, physical dermatoses, viral eruptions... Discussion. A consultation for dermatological emergencies appears to reply to patients demands. Nonetheless, most of these outpatients do not present with real dermatological emergencies. Criteria for real emergencies needs to be further defined and understood by citizens.展开更多
文摘Introduction. The aim of our study was to understand the motivations of outpatients who come to dermatological emergencies in a university hospital. Patients and method. This 6-week prospective study included outpatients who came to the dermatology emergency unit. This consultation is proposed each morning (from 8 to 9), from Mondays to Fridays. A questionnaire was distributed to outpatients. They answered questions on the functioning of this consultation and their own symptoms. The consulting dermatologist answered questions on the referring physician, the really urgent characteristics of the disease and the diagnosis. Results. Patients were satisfied by the functioning of the consultation. Indeed, 59 p. 100 of outpatients thought that the timetable was convenient and 70 p. 100 that the delay before getting a consultation was rapid. 75 p. 100 felt they needed treatment rapidly. Nonetheless, 45 p. 100 did not think they had a serious disease. More than half of the outpatients were referred by their general practitioner; the others came spontaneously, or were referred by other departments or general emergencies. The most frequent diagnoses were cutaneous infections (27.6 p. 100), eczema (21 p. 100), then benign tumors, psoriasis, physical dermatoses, viral eruptions... Discussion. A consultation for dermatological emergencies appears to reply to patients demands. Nonetheless, most of these outpatients do not present with real dermatological emergencies. Criteria for real emergencies needs to be further defined and understood by citizens.
