Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the modulatory roles of biological maturity and age on the predictors of performance in youth swimmers and their stability over a six-month training cycle.Methods In tota...Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the modulatory roles of biological maturity and age on the predictors of performance in youth swimmers and their stability over a six-month training cycle.Methods In total,28 swimmers(10 pre-pubertal[6 boys],11.1±1.8 years;18 pubertal[8 boys],15.2±2.0 years old)and 26 untrained controls(15 pre-pubertal[10 boys],9.7±1.5 years;11 pubertal[6 boys],14.4±0.5 years old)were recruited.At baseline,3-and 6-months,participants completed an incremental ramp cycle test,isometric handgrip strength test and countermovement jumps,with speed assessed as a measure of performance in swimmers.Principle component analysis(PCA)identified factors that described youth swimmers’physical profile,with linear mixed models subsequently used to determine their interaction with age and maturity on performance.Results Aerobic fitness and upper body strength were significantly higher in the trained participants,irrespective of maturity status or time-point.Four key factors were identified through PCA(anthropometrics;strength;aerobic capacity;aerobic rate),accounting for 90%of the between parameter variance.Age exerted a widespread influence on swimming performance predic-tors,influencing all four factors,whilst maturity only influenced the aerobic factors.The key age of divergence was 13 years.Conclusion Overall,the present study found no evidence of a maturational threshold in the aerobic or strength-related response to training in youth.The influence of age on performance predictors suggests that utilising a single or select group of parameters to inform selection and/or talent identification throughout the dynamic processes of growth and maturation should be avoided.展开更多
文摘Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the modulatory roles of biological maturity and age on the predictors of performance in youth swimmers and their stability over a six-month training cycle.Methods In total,28 swimmers(10 pre-pubertal[6 boys],11.1±1.8 years;18 pubertal[8 boys],15.2±2.0 years old)and 26 untrained controls(15 pre-pubertal[10 boys],9.7±1.5 years;11 pubertal[6 boys],14.4±0.5 years old)were recruited.At baseline,3-and 6-months,participants completed an incremental ramp cycle test,isometric handgrip strength test and countermovement jumps,with speed assessed as a measure of performance in swimmers.Principle component analysis(PCA)identified factors that described youth swimmers’physical profile,with linear mixed models subsequently used to determine their interaction with age and maturity on performance.Results Aerobic fitness and upper body strength were significantly higher in the trained participants,irrespective of maturity status or time-point.Four key factors were identified through PCA(anthropometrics;strength;aerobic capacity;aerobic rate),accounting for 90%of the between parameter variance.Age exerted a widespread influence on swimming performance predic-tors,influencing all four factors,whilst maturity only influenced the aerobic factors.The key age of divergence was 13 years.Conclusion Overall,the present study found no evidence of a maturational threshold in the aerobic or strength-related response to training in youth.The influence of age on performance predictors suggests that utilising a single or select group of parameters to inform selection and/or talent identification throughout the dynamic processes of growth and maturation should be avoided.
