Introduction: The incidence of acute pain after craniotomy differs remarkably in previous studies, and the prevalence of persistent pain is not precisely known. We conducted 6-month follow-up surveys on the incidence ...Introduction: The incidence of acute pain after craniotomy differs remarkably in previous studies, and the prevalence of persistent pain is not precisely known. We conducted 6-month follow-up surveys on the incidence and intensity of acute and persistent pain after elective craniotomy. Methods: We carried out a prospective cohort study via a series of structured questionnaires to record acute pain intensity preoperatively and postoperatively, and the incidence of persistent pain 3 and 6 months after a craniotomy in a tertiary care center. Patients scheduled for elective craniotomy were interviewed the day before surgery, postoperatively before discharge from the hospital, and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Pain was assessed on a numeric rating scale (0 - 10) at rest and movement, as well as expectations of pain before surgery, efficacy of pain therapy, and satisfaction with pain treatment. The incidence of adverse events, sleep time and interruptions caused by pain, different pain types, and drugs used for pain treatment were also recorded. Results: A total of 152 patients were enrolled in the study and completed the preoperative questionnaire;123 (81%) completed postoperative questionnaire and 108 (72%) completed the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. The average pain score at the time of the postoperative questionnaire was moderate, 4 at rest and 5 upon movement. The percentage of patients experiencing mild pain at rest and upon movement was 52% and 49%, and moderate pain was 15% and 16%, respectively. Severe postoperative pain was detected in 5% and 8% of patients at rest and upon movement, respectively. Three months after surgery, 6% of patients reported mild pain at rest, 3% moderate pain at rest, and 1% severe pain at rest. Persistent mild and moderate pain at rest after 6 months was reported by 3% and 1% of patients, respectively. The most common adverse events were postoperative nausea and vomiting (11%) and abdominal discomfort (8%). During postoperative pain treatment in the intensive care unit or post-anesthesia care unit, 92% of patients received acetaminophen, 88% fentanyl, and 24% oxycodone. During neurosurgical ward care, ibuprofen was used in 61% of patients. Satisfaction with analgesia was high throughout the study period with a median satisfaction score of 9 postoperatively and 10 at 3 and 6 months on the 0 - 10 scale. Conclusion: The findings indicate that most patients experience moderate or mild pain after craniotomy, but patient satisfaction with pain treatment is high. Persistent pain after 3 and 6 months is rare and mild in nature.展开更多
Purpose: Patients scheduled to undergo the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are usually octogenarians with severe co-morbidities and an increased risk of surgery-associated complications. The aim of this ...Purpose: Patients scheduled to undergo the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are usually octogenarians with severe co-morbidities and an increased risk of surgery-associated complications. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of insufficient oxygen delivery as measured by mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) via invasive continuous cardiopulmonary monitoring and the low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) in patients undergoing the TAVR procedure. The second objective was to examine how these hemodynamic measurements would change during critical events, such as rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) during this procedure. Methods: This prospective, observational study, examined twenty patients undergoing TAVR under general anesthesia. Hemodynamic variables, SvO2 and the continuous cardiac output (CO) were assessed using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and a Vigilance? monitor. Insufficient oxygen delivery was defined as a SvO2 value under 58% and LCOS as a cardiac index (CI) under 2 L/min/m2. Total intravenous anesthesia and hemodynamic management protocol were standardized. RVP was induced twice during the procedure at a frequency of 180 - 200/min. Predefined clinical endpoints were assessed during the procedure and hemodynamic values were analyzed before and after twelve critical events. Results: The data of twenty patients with a mean age of 80 ± 4 years and EuroSCORE 18 ± 10 were analyzed. Fourteen (70%) of the TAVR procedures were performed transapically, the other six (30%) transfemorally. The SvO2 value under 58% (mean 54 ± 6) and the CI under 2 L/min/m2 (mean 1.6 ± 0.2) were detected in 60% of patients (n = 12) before the use of RVP. All of these patients received perioperative inotropic medication and required norepinephrine infusion for maintenance of adequate blood pressure. The SvO2, CO and CI were significantly decreased after the use of RVP (P 2 reverted rapidly to the same level as before the application of RVP (1 min), CO, and CI 10 min later. At the end of the operation SvO2 values were at same level as before RVP and CO and CI were higher than before RVP. Conclusion: A high incidence of insufficient oxygen delivery and low cardiac output syndrome were detected in patients undergoing TAVR procedures. Nonetheless, all hemodynamic values returned rather rapidly to the same level as before the use of the RVP and were at the optimal level at the end of the procedure. According to the current study, the most hemodynamically hazardous steps during TAVR are the use of RVP sequences, the induction of anesthesia and the initiation of surgery.展开更多
文摘Introduction: The incidence of acute pain after craniotomy differs remarkably in previous studies, and the prevalence of persistent pain is not precisely known. We conducted 6-month follow-up surveys on the incidence and intensity of acute and persistent pain after elective craniotomy. Methods: We carried out a prospective cohort study via a series of structured questionnaires to record acute pain intensity preoperatively and postoperatively, and the incidence of persistent pain 3 and 6 months after a craniotomy in a tertiary care center. Patients scheduled for elective craniotomy were interviewed the day before surgery, postoperatively before discharge from the hospital, and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Pain was assessed on a numeric rating scale (0 - 10) at rest and movement, as well as expectations of pain before surgery, efficacy of pain therapy, and satisfaction with pain treatment. The incidence of adverse events, sleep time and interruptions caused by pain, different pain types, and drugs used for pain treatment were also recorded. Results: A total of 152 patients were enrolled in the study and completed the preoperative questionnaire;123 (81%) completed postoperative questionnaire and 108 (72%) completed the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. The average pain score at the time of the postoperative questionnaire was moderate, 4 at rest and 5 upon movement. The percentage of patients experiencing mild pain at rest and upon movement was 52% and 49%, and moderate pain was 15% and 16%, respectively. Severe postoperative pain was detected in 5% and 8% of patients at rest and upon movement, respectively. Three months after surgery, 6% of patients reported mild pain at rest, 3% moderate pain at rest, and 1% severe pain at rest. Persistent mild and moderate pain at rest after 6 months was reported by 3% and 1% of patients, respectively. The most common adverse events were postoperative nausea and vomiting (11%) and abdominal discomfort (8%). During postoperative pain treatment in the intensive care unit or post-anesthesia care unit, 92% of patients received acetaminophen, 88% fentanyl, and 24% oxycodone. During neurosurgical ward care, ibuprofen was used in 61% of patients. Satisfaction with analgesia was high throughout the study period with a median satisfaction score of 9 postoperatively and 10 at 3 and 6 months on the 0 - 10 scale. Conclusion: The findings indicate that most patients experience moderate or mild pain after craniotomy, but patient satisfaction with pain treatment is high. Persistent pain after 3 and 6 months is rare and mild in nature.
文摘Purpose: Patients scheduled to undergo the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are usually octogenarians with severe co-morbidities and an increased risk of surgery-associated complications. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of insufficient oxygen delivery as measured by mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) via invasive continuous cardiopulmonary monitoring and the low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) in patients undergoing the TAVR procedure. The second objective was to examine how these hemodynamic measurements would change during critical events, such as rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) during this procedure. Methods: This prospective, observational study, examined twenty patients undergoing TAVR under general anesthesia. Hemodynamic variables, SvO2 and the continuous cardiac output (CO) were assessed using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and a Vigilance? monitor. Insufficient oxygen delivery was defined as a SvO2 value under 58% and LCOS as a cardiac index (CI) under 2 L/min/m2. Total intravenous anesthesia and hemodynamic management protocol were standardized. RVP was induced twice during the procedure at a frequency of 180 - 200/min. Predefined clinical endpoints were assessed during the procedure and hemodynamic values were analyzed before and after twelve critical events. Results: The data of twenty patients with a mean age of 80 ± 4 years and EuroSCORE 18 ± 10 were analyzed. Fourteen (70%) of the TAVR procedures were performed transapically, the other six (30%) transfemorally. The SvO2 value under 58% (mean 54 ± 6) and the CI under 2 L/min/m2 (mean 1.6 ± 0.2) were detected in 60% of patients (n = 12) before the use of RVP. All of these patients received perioperative inotropic medication and required norepinephrine infusion for maintenance of adequate blood pressure. The SvO2, CO and CI were significantly decreased after the use of RVP (P 2 reverted rapidly to the same level as before the application of RVP (1 min), CO, and CI 10 min later. At the end of the operation SvO2 values were at same level as before RVP and CO and CI were higher than before RVP. Conclusion: A high incidence of insufficient oxygen delivery and low cardiac output syndrome were detected in patients undergoing TAVR procedures. Nonetheless, all hemodynamic values returned rather rapidly to the same level as before the use of the RVP and were at the optimal level at the end of the procedure. According to the current study, the most hemodynamically hazardous steps during TAVR are the use of RVP sequences, the induction of anesthesia and the initiation of surgery.
