To study the clinical value of MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 860 patients with lumbar disc herniation received in our hospital from March 2019 to March 2020 were selected. All patients were ...To study the clinical value of MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 860 patients with lumbar disc herniation received in our hospital from March 2019 to March 2020 were selected. All patients were diagnosed by MRI and CT. The former was set as the observation group and the latter as the control group. The diagnostic results of the two groups were compared. Results: the positive rate, the rate of dural sac compression and the rate of spinal cord deformation in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the comparison between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The detection rates of intervertebral disc pneumatosis and calcification in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the comparison between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: for patients with lumbar disc herniation, magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis and CT have their own advantages in sign examination, but the former has a higher positive detection rate, which can further improve the accuracy of diagnosis and is worthy of clinical promotion.展开更多
文摘To study the clinical value of MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 860 patients with lumbar disc herniation received in our hospital from March 2019 to March 2020 were selected. All patients were diagnosed by MRI and CT. The former was set as the observation group and the latter as the control group. The diagnostic results of the two groups were compared. Results: the positive rate, the rate of dural sac compression and the rate of spinal cord deformation in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the comparison between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The detection rates of intervertebral disc pneumatosis and calcification in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the comparison between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: for patients with lumbar disc herniation, magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis and CT have their own advantages in sign examination, but the former has a higher positive detection rate, which can further improve the accuracy of diagnosis and is worthy of clinical promotion.
