期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
心理干预对肩关节痛患者心理健康及生活质量的影响
1
作者 海贝贝 徐志华 栗艳华 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2025年第3期382-386,共5页
目的:研究心理干预对肩关节痛患者心理健康及生活质量的影响。方法:选取2020年3月-2022年2月某院诊治的102例肩周炎患者,依据信封法分为对照组与观察组,对照组50例采用常规护理,观察组52例在对照组基础上实施心理干预。对比两组焦虑自... 目的:研究心理干预对肩关节痛患者心理健康及生活质量的影响。方法:选取2020年3月-2022年2月某院诊治的102例肩周炎患者,依据信封法分为对照组与观察组,对照组50例采用常规护理,观察组52例在对照组基础上实施心理干预。对比两组焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、肩关节评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、生活质量评分,统计两组患者满意度情况。结果:两组干预前SAS、SDS评分进行对比,差异无统计学意义,两组干预后SDS、SAS评分下降且观察组下降幅度大于对照组(t=8.961,6.095;P<0.01);两组干预前4项肩关节评分比较,差异无统计学差异,干预后肢体活动度评分、肌力评分进行比较,无统计学差异,干预后两组日常生活活动能力、肢体活动度评分及肌力比干预前升高(观察组:t=16.523,15.086,11.774,P<0.01;对照组:t=14.304,13.815,10.697,P<0.01),干预后观察组日常生活活动能力高于对照组患者(t=2.073,P<0.05),干预后两组疼痛评分下降(观察组:t=15.851,对照组:t=14.577;P<0.01),观察组低于对照组患者(t=3.395,P<0.001);干预前两组两项生活质量评分比较无统计学差异,干预后两组健康状况调查表(SF-36)评分、生活质量(GQOLI-74)评分升高(观察组:t=13.665,11.508,对照组:t=10.366,9.067;P<0.01),观察组高于对照组;观察组总满意率为96.15%,对照组总满意率为80.77%,观察组总满意率较对照组患者更高(χ^(2)=4.258,P<0.05)。结论:心理干预可有效促进肩关节痛患者心理健康,缓解患者疼痛程度,改善患者生活质量。 展开更多
关键词 心理干预 肩关节痛 焦虑自评量表 抑郁自评量表 生活质量 心理健康
原文传递
Study on the Distribution of Migrant Workers' Employment Destinations A Case Study of Henan Province, China
2
作者 Gao Genghe Luo Qing +2 位作者 hai beibei Xu Jiawei Li Erling 《Journal of Earth Science and Engineering》 2015年第1期66-75,共10页
The choice of employment destination is the basis of migrant workers' spatial flow, the study on the choice of employment destination is helpful to understand the spatial law of migrant workers' flow from a micro pe... The choice of employment destination is the basis of migrant workers' spatial flow, the study on the choice of employment destination is helpful to understand the spatial law of migrant workers' flow from a micro perspective. Through the case study on 11 sample villages generated by the random stratified sampling in Henan Province, authors of this paper find that the distribution of destinations is dispersed in a large area while concentrated in certain places. Most of the destinations are in counties and outside Henan Province. Migrant workers are mainly concentrated in the economically more developed eastern provinces. The central, though a big source of migrant workers, has not formed a core employment area for migrant workers. The main factors influencing migrant workers' choice of employment distances include age, family size, per capita arable land, the village's economic development level, the village terrain, transportation, its distance from the nearest city, and workers' relationship networks. From the perspective of employment destinations, on a provincial scale, the employment attraction coefficient based on the destination's level of economic development and the employment distance, efficiently explains farmers' choice of destinations, that is, destinations with a more developed economy and a shorter employment distance are the top choice for migrant workers. 展开更多
关键词 Employment destination migrant workers DISTRIBUTION Henan Province.
在线阅读 下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部