Objective: to analyze the effect of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of uterine malformation. Methods: a total of 100 patients with suspected uterine malformations were investigated. All pati...Objective: to analyze the effect of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of uterine malformation. Methods: a total of 100 patients with suspected uterine malformations were investigated. All patients were admitted to the group from February 2018 to March 2022. All patients underwent hysteroscopy, two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound. Taking hysteroscopy as the gold standard, the accuracy, specificity and sensitivity of different methods were compared, and the characteristics of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound imaging were analyzed. Results: in all patients, hysteroscopy, two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound showed 70, 44 and 66 cases of uterine malformation, respectively, and 30, 56 and 34 cases of non-uterine malformation were detected. The sensitivity of three-dimensional ultrasound was 94.29%(66/70), and that of two-dimensional ultrasound was 62.86%(44/70). The specificity of the two methods was 100%(30/30), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound examination was 96%(96 cases), and that of two-dimensional ultrasound examination was 74%(74 cases). There was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: compared with two-dimensional ultrasound, transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound has higher accuracy and sensitivity in the diagnosis of uterine malformation, clear imaging, and can be used to judge the specific manifestations of uterine malformation. It has a positive effect on the clinical treatment of diseases, so it is recommended to be popularized.展开更多
文摘Objective: to analyze the effect of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of uterine malformation. Methods: a total of 100 patients with suspected uterine malformations were investigated. All patients were admitted to the group from February 2018 to March 2022. All patients underwent hysteroscopy, two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound. Taking hysteroscopy as the gold standard, the accuracy, specificity and sensitivity of different methods were compared, and the characteristics of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound imaging were analyzed. Results: in all patients, hysteroscopy, two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound showed 70, 44 and 66 cases of uterine malformation, respectively, and 30, 56 and 34 cases of non-uterine malformation were detected. The sensitivity of three-dimensional ultrasound was 94.29%(66/70), and that of two-dimensional ultrasound was 62.86%(44/70). The specificity of the two methods was 100%(30/30), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound examination was 96%(96 cases), and that of two-dimensional ultrasound examination was 74%(74 cases). There was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: compared with two-dimensional ultrasound, transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound has higher accuracy and sensitivity in the diagnosis of uterine malformation, clear imaging, and can be used to judge the specific manifestations of uterine malformation. It has a positive effect on the clinical treatment of diseases, so it is recommended to be popularized.
