BACKGROUND An increasing number of older patients is undergoing curative,surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.Previous meta-analyses have shown that older patients suffered from more postoperative morbidity and mor...BACKGROUND An increasing number of older patients is undergoing curative,surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.Previous meta-analyses have shown that older patients suffered from more postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients,which may lead to patient selection based on age.However,only studies including patients that underwent open esophagectomy were included.Therefore,it remains unknown whether there is an association between age and outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy.AIM To perform a systematic review on age and postoperative outcome in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.METHODS Studies comparing older with younger patients with primary esophageal cancer undergoing curative esophagectomy were included.Meta-analysis of studies using a 75-year age threshold are presented in the manuscript,studies using other age thresholds in the Supplementary material.MEDLINE,Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between 1995 and 2020.Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak,pulmonary and cardiac complications,delirium,30-and 90-d,and in-hospital mortality.Secondary outcomes included pneumonia and 5-year overall survival.RESULTS Seven studies(4847 patients)using an age threshold of 75 years were included for meta-analysis with 755 older and 4092 younger patients.Older patients(9.05%)had higher rates of 90-d mortality compared with younger patients(3.92%),(confidence interval=1.10-5.56).In addition,older patients(9.45%)had higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared with younger patients(3.68%),(confidence interval=1.01-5.91).In the subgroup of 2 studies with minimally invasive esophagectomy,older and younger patients had comparable 30-d,90-d and in-hospital mortality rates.CONCLUSION Older patients undergoing curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have a higher postoperative mortality risk.Minimally invasive esophagectomy may be important for minimizing mortality in older patients.展开更多
Surgical innovation and pioneering are important for improving patient outcome, but can be associated with learning curves. Although learning curves in surgery are a recognized problem, the impact of surgical learning...Surgical innovation and pioneering are important for improving patient outcome, but can be associated with learning curves. Although learning curves in surgery are a recognized problem, the impact of surgical learning curves is increasing, due to increasing complexity of innovative surgical procedures, the rapid rate at which new interventions are implemented and a decrease in relative effectiveness of new interventions compared to old interventions. For minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE), there is now robust evidence that implementation can lead to significant learning associated morbidity(morbidity during a learning curve, that could have been avoided if patients were operated by surgeons that have completed the learning curve). This article provides an overview of the evidence of the impact of learning curves after implementation of MIE. In addition, caveats for implementation and available evidence regarding factors that are important for safe implementation and safe pioneering of MIE are discussed.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND An increasing number of older patients is undergoing curative,surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.Previous meta-analyses have shown that older patients suffered from more postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients,which may lead to patient selection based on age.However,only studies including patients that underwent open esophagectomy were included.Therefore,it remains unknown whether there is an association between age and outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy.AIM To perform a systematic review on age and postoperative outcome in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.METHODS Studies comparing older with younger patients with primary esophageal cancer undergoing curative esophagectomy were included.Meta-analysis of studies using a 75-year age threshold are presented in the manuscript,studies using other age thresholds in the Supplementary material.MEDLINE,Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between 1995 and 2020.Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak,pulmonary and cardiac complications,delirium,30-and 90-d,and in-hospital mortality.Secondary outcomes included pneumonia and 5-year overall survival.RESULTS Seven studies(4847 patients)using an age threshold of 75 years were included for meta-analysis with 755 older and 4092 younger patients.Older patients(9.05%)had higher rates of 90-d mortality compared with younger patients(3.92%),(confidence interval=1.10-5.56).In addition,older patients(9.45%)had higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared with younger patients(3.68%),(confidence interval=1.01-5.91).In the subgroup of 2 studies with minimally invasive esophagectomy,older and younger patients had comparable 30-d,90-d and in-hospital mortality rates.CONCLUSION Older patients undergoing curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have a higher postoperative mortality risk.Minimally invasive esophagectomy may be important for minimizing mortality in older patients.
文摘Surgical innovation and pioneering are important for improving patient outcome, but can be associated with learning curves. Although learning curves in surgery are a recognized problem, the impact of surgical learning curves is increasing, due to increasing complexity of innovative surgical procedures, the rapid rate at which new interventions are implemented and a decrease in relative effectiveness of new interventions compared to old interventions. For minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE), there is now robust evidence that implementation can lead to significant learning associated morbidity(morbidity during a learning curve, that could have been avoided if patients were operated by surgeons that have completed the learning curve). This article provides an overview of the evidence of the impact of learning curves after implementation of MIE. In addition, caveats for implementation and available evidence regarding factors that are important for safe implementation and safe pioneering of MIE are discussed.
