There is some discrepancy in the classification of different species of Hylopetes, particularly regarding systematic status of H. electilis and H. phayrei and their relationship to other species. In the present study,...There is some discrepancy in the classification of different species of Hylopetes, particularly regarding systematic status of H. electilis and H. phayrei and their relationship to other species. In the present study, for the first time we have brought together six of the nine Hylopetes species and performed statistical analysis of 14 measurable cranial variables, analyzing in total 89 specimens, including H. electilis, H. alboniger, H. phayrei, H. lepidus, H. spadiceus, and H. nigripes. Both univariate and multivariate analysis results indicate that H. electilis can not only be obviously distinguished from H. phayrei, but also clearly differs from the other four Hylopetes species. These results sustain the contention that H. electilis is neither a synonym nor subspecies ofH. phayrei, but should be considered a distinct and valid species. Subsequently, a straightforward discussion on the biogeography of Hylopetes in southeastem Asia gives further insight into the differentiation and variety of species belonging to this genus.展开更多
There is some discrepancy in the classification of different species of Hylopetes,particularly regarding systematic status of H.electilis and H.phayrei and their relationship to other species.In the present study,for ...There is some discrepancy in the classification of different species of Hylopetes,particularly regarding systematic status of H.electilis and H.phayrei and their relationship to other species.In the present study,for the first time we have brought together six of the nine Hylopetes species and performed statistical analysis of 14 measurable cranial variables,analyzing in total 89 specimens,including H.electilis,H.alboniger,H.phayrei,H.lepidus,H.spadiceus,and H.nigripes.Both univariate and multivariate analysis results indicate that H.electilis can not only be obviously distinguished from H.phayrei,but also clearly differs from the other four Hylopetes species.These results sustain the contention that H.electilis is neither a synonym nor subspecies of H.phayrei,but should be considered a distinct and valid species.Subsequently,a straightforward discussion on the biogeography of Hylopetes in southeastern Asia gives further insight into the differentiation and variety of species belonging to this genus.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(30970332)Natural Science Found of Yunnan province(2007C099M)
文摘There is some discrepancy in the classification of different species of Hylopetes, particularly regarding systematic status of H. electilis and H. phayrei and their relationship to other species. In the present study, for the first time we have brought together six of the nine Hylopetes species and performed statistical analysis of 14 measurable cranial variables, analyzing in total 89 specimens, including H. electilis, H. alboniger, H. phayrei, H. lepidus, H. spadiceus, and H. nigripes. Both univariate and multivariate analysis results indicate that H. electilis can not only be obviously distinguished from H. phayrei, but also clearly differs from the other four Hylopetes species. These results sustain the contention that H. electilis is neither a synonym nor subspecies ofH. phayrei, but should be considered a distinct and valid species. Subsequently, a straightforward discussion on the biogeography of Hylopetes in southeastem Asia gives further insight into the differentiation and variety of species belonging to this genus.
基金This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(30970332)Natural Science Found of Yunnan province(2007C099M).
文摘There is some discrepancy in the classification of different species of Hylopetes,particularly regarding systematic status of H.electilis and H.phayrei and their relationship to other species.In the present study,for the first time we have brought together six of the nine Hylopetes species and performed statistical analysis of 14 measurable cranial variables,analyzing in total 89 specimens,including H.electilis,H.alboniger,H.phayrei,H.lepidus,H.spadiceus,and H.nigripes.Both univariate and multivariate analysis results indicate that H.electilis can not only be obviously distinguished from H.phayrei,but also clearly differs from the other four Hylopetes species.These results sustain the contention that H.electilis is neither a synonym nor subspecies of H.phayrei,but should be considered a distinct and valid species.Subsequently,a straightforward discussion on the biogeography of Hylopetes in southeastern Asia gives further insight into the differentiation and variety of species belonging to this genus.
