Objective: the effect of emergency intervention on traumatic shock patients and its effect on rescue success. Methods: 100 patients with traumatic shock admitted to our center from January 2020 to June 2021 were analy...Objective: the effect of emergency intervention on traumatic shock patients and its effect on rescue success. Methods: 100 patients with traumatic shock admitted to our center from January 2020 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. According to various nursing interventions, the samples were divided into two groups with 50 cases in each group. The two groups of patients were divided into the control group (routine nursing) and the research group (pre-hospital emergency intervention), and the intervention effects of the two groups were compared. Results: compared with the control group, the research group had shorter consultation and treatment time and higher rescue success rate (P.0.05). The total incidence of asphyxia, intravascular coagulation and organ dysfunction in the study group was 4.00%, significantly lower than that in the control group (16.00% (p.05). Before the operation, there was no difference in scores and scores between the two groups (after the intervention, the scores were lower than those of the control group, while the scores of the research group were higher than those of the control group (P.0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the study group was 96.00% (very satisfactory 72.00%, basic satisfactory 24.00%) significantly higher than that of the control group 84.00% (very satisfactory 54.00%, basic satisfactory 28.00%) (P.0.05). Conclusion: the effect of pre-hospital emergency nursing intervention for traumatic shock patients is significant, which can shorten the consultation time and treatment time, improve the success rate of rescue, reduce the incidence of related complications, improve the prognosis and enhance the satisfaction of nursing service, etc. Therefore, the intervention model is worthy of clinical reference and promotion.展开更多
文摘Objective: the effect of emergency intervention on traumatic shock patients and its effect on rescue success. Methods: 100 patients with traumatic shock admitted to our center from January 2020 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. According to various nursing interventions, the samples were divided into two groups with 50 cases in each group. The two groups of patients were divided into the control group (routine nursing) and the research group (pre-hospital emergency intervention), and the intervention effects of the two groups were compared. Results: compared with the control group, the research group had shorter consultation and treatment time and higher rescue success rate (P.0.05). The total incidence of asphyxia, intravascular coagulation and organ dysfunction in the study group was 4.00%, significantly lower than that in the control group (16.00% (p.05). Before the operation, there was no difference in scores and scores between the two groups (after the intervention, the scores were lower than those of the control group, while the scores of the research group were higher than those of the control group (P.0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the study group was 96.00% (very satisfactory 72.00%, basic satisfactory 24.00%) significantly higher than that of the control group 84.00% (very satisfactory 54.00%, basic satisfactory 28.00%) (P.0.05). Conclusion: the effect of pre-hospital emergency nursing intervention for traumatic shock patients is significant, which can shorten the consultation time and treatment time, improve the success rate of rescue, reduce the incidence of related complications, improve the prognosis and enhance the satisfaction of nursing service, etc. Therefore, the intervention model is worthy of clinical reference and promotion.
