期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
A novel preoperative inflammatory marker prognostic score in patients with localized and metastatic renal cell carcinoma 被引量:2
1
作者 Rishi R.Sekar Dattatraya Patil +12 位作者 Yoram Baum Jeffrey Pearl Anna Bausum Mehmet A.Bilen Omer Kucuk Wayne B.Harris Bradley C.Carthon Mehrdad Alemozaffar christopher p.filson John G.Pattaras Peter T.Nieh Kenneth Ogan Viraj A.Master 《Asian Journal of Urology》 2017年第4期230-238,共9页
Objective:Several inflammatory markers have been studied as potential biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma(RCC),however few reports have analyzed their prognostic value in aggregate and in non-clear cell histologies.We ... Objective:Several inflammatory markers have been studied as potential biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma(RCC),however few reports have analyzed their prognostic value in aggregate and in non-clear cell histologies.We hypothesize that a combination of specific inflammatory markers into an RCC Inflammatory Score(RISK)could serve as a rigorous prognostic indicator of overall survival(OS)in patients with clear cell and non-clear cell RCC.Methods:Combination of preoperative C-reactive protein(CRP),albumin,erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR),corrected calcium,and aspartate transaminase to alanine transaminase(AST/ALT)ratio was used to develop RISK.RISK was developed using grid-search methodology,receiver-operating-characteristic(ROC)analysis,and sensitivity-specificity trade-off analysis.Prognostic value of RISK was analyzed using the KaplaneMeier method and Cox proportional regression models.Predictive accuracy was compared with RISK to Size,Size,Grade,and Necrosis(SSIGN)score,University of California-LOS Angeles(UCLA)Integrated Staging System(UISS),and Leibovich Prognosis Score(LPS). 展开更多
关键词 Renal cell carcinoma INFLAMMATION PROGNOSIS BIOMARKER
暂未订购
Survival benefit with extended lymphadenectomy for advanced renal malignancy: A population-based analysis
2
作者 Dean Laganosky christopher p.filson +1 位作者 Dattatraya Patil Viraj A.Master 《Asian Journal of Urology》 CSCD 2020年第1期29-36,共8页
Objective:We used population-based data to examine the possible benefit of extended lymphadenectomy for patients with renal malignancy in the setting of more advanced disease.Methods:The Surveillance,Epidemiology,and ... Objective:We used population-based data to examine the possible benefit of extended lymphadenectomy for patients with renal malignancy in the setting of more advanced disease.Methods:The Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results(SEER)database was utilized to identify non-metastatic,T3-T4 renal cancer patients from 2004-2015 treated with removal of≥1 lymph node at the time of nephrectomy.Non-parametric bivariate statistics were used to assess associations between covariates of interest and extended lymphadenectomy(≥10 lymph nodes removed).Cancer-specific survival(CSS)and overall survival(OS)benefit was evaluated using Kaplane-Meier analysis.Results:Of the 4397 patients identified,816(18.6%)underwent extended lymphadenectomy.For patients with T3a disease,5-year CSS and OS benefit with extended lymphadenectomy did not reach statistical significance(CSS:hazard ratio[HR]0.98,95%confidence interval[CI]0.77-1.24;OS:HR 0.96,95%CI 0.77-1.20).Conversely,for those with T3b-T3c disease,extended lymphadenectomy led to statistically significant improvements in both 5-year CSS and OS compared to non-extended lymphadenectomy(CSS:HR 0.78,95%CI 0.61-0.99;OS:HR 0.72,95%CI 0.58-0.90).Finally,for those with T4 disease,use of extended lymphadenectomy had OS benefit after 5 years(OS:HR 0.51,HR 0.29-0.90,p = 0.02).Conclusion:Based on population-level data,extended lymphadenectomy was associated with improved survival in select patients with advanced renal malignancy treated with surgical nephrectomy.Understanding the basis of these real-world findings in the face of conflicting randomized trial results will be key,moving forward. 展开更多
关键词 Extended lymphadenectomy Lymph node dissection Advanced renal malignancy Renal cell carcinoma
暂未订购
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部