Dear Editor,We are writing to express concerns regarding the recent paper“A unique pseudo-eligibility analysis of longitudinal laboratory performance data from a transgender female competitive cyclist”by Hamilton et...Dear Editor,We are writing to express concerns regarding the recent paper“A unique pseudo-eligibility analysis of longitudinal laboratory performance data from a transgender female competitive cyclist”by Hamilton et al.[1].The authors assert that a sub-elite trans woman athlete can compete equitably in elite women’s cycling events after one year of gender-affirming hormone therapy(GAHT).However,this conclusion is not supported by the data presented.Furthermore,the authors’presentation of data from a single athlete as a basis for inferring the effects of testosterone suppression is fundamentally flawed.展开更多
文摘Dear Editor,We are writing to express concerns regarding the recent paper“A unique pseudo-eligibility analysis of longitudinal laboratory performance data from a transgender female competitive cyclist”by Hamilton et al.[1].The authors assert that a sub-elite trans woman athlete can compete equitably in elite women’s cycling events after one year of gender-affirming hormone therapy(GAHT).However,this conclusion is not supported by the data presented.Furthermore,the authors’presentation of data from a single athlete as a basis for inferring the effects of testosterone suppression is fundamentally flawed.
