Objective: to explore the value of humanistic care in patients with advanced tumors. Methods: the selection range of research subjects was the advanced tumor patients (n=80) treated in our hospital from January 2020 t...Objective: to explore the value of humanistic care in patients with advanced tumors. Methods: the selection range of research subjects was the advanced tumor patients (n=80) treated in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2021. According to the random digital table regulations, 40 patients in a control group all took routine care as the intervention plan, and 40 patients in the observation group would increase human care. After implementing their respective nursing work, the groups were evaluated from the state of mind (SAS, SDS), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF scale), and satisfaction of care (questionnaire). Results: group comparisons between SAS and SDS scores were not significant (P> 0.05) and significant after intervention (P <0.05). The group comparison of scores of QoL indicators was not statistically significant (P> 0.05) and significant after intervention (P <0.05). Regarding the group comparison of care satisfaction, the difference was significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: the introduction of humanistic care in clinical nursing work has significant advantages in guiding negative psychology, and can also have a positive effect on the improvement of patient quality of life and nursing satisfaction.展开更多
文摘Objective: to explore the value of humanistic care in patients with advanced tumors. Methods: the selection range of research subjects was the advanced tumor patients (n=80) treated in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2021. According to the random digital table regulations, 40 patients in a control group all took routine care as the intervention plan, and 40 patients in the observation group would increase human care. After implementing their respective nursing work, the groups were evaluated from the state of mind (SAS, SDS), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF scale), and satisfaction of care (questionnaire). Results: group comparisons between SAS and SDS scores were not significant (P> 0.05) and significant after intervention (P <0.05). The group comparison of scores of QoL indicators was not statistically significant (P> 0.05) and significant after intervention (P <0.05). Regarding the group comparison of care satisfaction, the difference was significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: the introduction of humanistic care in clinical nursing work has significant advantages in guiding negative psychology, and can also have a positive effect on the improvement of patient quality of life and nursing satisfaction.
