期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Which Research Is Needed to Support Clinical Decision-Making on Integrative Medicine?——Can Comparative Effectiveness Research Close the Gap? 被引量:2
1
作者 Claudia M.Witt 黄文静 +1 位作者 Lixing Lao berman bm 《Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine》 SCIE CAS 2012年第10期723-729,共7页
In clinical research on complementary and integrative medicine, experts and scientists have often pursued a research agenda in spite of an incomplete understanding of the needs of end users. Consequently, the majority... In clinical research on complementary and integrative medicine, experts and scientists have often pursued a research agenda in spite of an incomplete understanding of the needs of end users. Consequently, the majority of previous clinical trials have mainly assessed the efficacy of interventions. Scant data is available on their effectiveness. Comparative effectiveness research (CER) promises to support decision makers by generating evidence that compares the benefits and harms of the best care options. This evidence, more generalizable than the evidence generated by traditional randomized controlled trials (RCTs), is better suited to inform real-world care decisions. An emphasis on CER supports the development of the evidence base for clinical and policy decision-making. Whereas in most areas of complementary and integrative medicine data on comparative effectiveness is scarce, available acupuncture research already contributes to CER evidence. This paper wil introduce CER and make suggestions for future research. 展开更多
关键词 comparative effectiveness research decision making integrative medicine Chinese medicine acupuncture
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部