BACKGROUND Childhood obesity is a significant public health concern,particularly amongst children with chronic kidney disease requiring kidney transplant(KT).Obesity,defined as a body mass index(BMI)of 30 kg/m^(2) or ...BACKGROUND Childhood obesity is a significant public health concern,particularly amongst children with chronic kidney disease requiring kidney transplant(KT).Obesity,defined as a body mass index(BMI)of 30 kg/m^(2) or greater,is prevalent in this population and is associated with disease progression.While BMI in-fluences adult KT eligibility,its impact on pediatric transplant outcomes remains unclear.This study investigates the effect of BMI on graft survival and patient outcomes,addressing gaps in the literature and examining disparities across BMI classifications.AIM To assess the impact of BMI classifications on graft and patient survival following KT.METHODS A retrospective cohort study analyzed 23081 pediatric transplant recipients from the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database(1987-2022).Patients were grouped into six BMI categories:Underweight,healthy weight,overweight,and Class 1,2,and 3 obesity.Data were analyzed using one-way way analysis of variance,Kruskal-Wallis tests,Chi-squared tests,Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank tests,and Cox proportional hazard regressions.Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.RESULTS Class 3 obese recipients had lower 1-year graft survival(88.7%)compared to healthy-weight recipients(93.1%,P=0.012).Underweight recipients had lower 10-year patient survival(81.3%,P<0.05)than healthy-weight recipients.Class 2 and 3 obese recipients had the lowest 5-year graft survival(67.8%and 68.3%,P=0.013)and Class 2 obesity had the lowest 10-year graft survival(40.7%).Cox regression identified increases in BMI category as an independent predictor of graft failure[hazard ratio(HR)=1.091,P<0.001]and mortality(HR=1.079,P=0.008).Obese patients experienced longer cold ischemia times(11.6 and 13.1 hours vs 10.2 hours,P<0.001).Class 3 obesity had the highest proportion of Black recipients(26.2%vs 17.9%,P<0.001).CONCLUSION Severe obesity and underweight status are associated with poorer long-term outcomes in pediatric KT recipients,emphasizing the need for nuanced transplant eligibility criteria addressing obesity-related risks and socioeconomic disparities.展开更多
Non-descriptive and convenient labels are uninformative and unfairly project blame onto patients.The language clinicians use in the Electronic Medical Record,research,and clinical settings shapes biases and subsequent...Non-descriptive and convenient labels are uninformative and unfairly project blame onto patients.The language clinicians use in the Electronic Medical Record,research,and clinical settings shapes biases and subsequent behaviors of all providers involved in the enterprise of transplantation.Terminology such as noncompliant and nonadherent serve as a reason for waitlist inactivation and limit access to life-saving transplantation.These labels fail to capture all the circum-stances surrounding a patient’s inability to follow their care regimen,trivialize social determinants of health variables,and bring unsubstantiated subjectivity into decisions regarding organ allocation.Furthermore,insufficient Medicare coverage has forced patients to ration or stop taking medication,leading to allograft failure and their subsequent diagnosis of noncompliant.We argue that perpetuating non-descriptive language adds little substantive information,in-creases subjectivity to the organ allocation process,and plays a major role in reduced access to transplantation.For patients with existing barriers to care,such as racial/ethnic minorities,these effects may be even more drastic.Transplant committees must ensure thorough documentation to correctly encapsulate the entirety of a patient’s position and give voice to an already vulnerable population.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Childhood obesity is a significant public health concern,particularly amongst children with chronic kidney disease requiring kidney transplant(KT).Obesity,defined as a body mass index(BMI)of 30 kg/m^(2) or greater,is prevalent in this population and is associated with disease progression.While BMI in-fluences adult KT eligibility,its impact on pediatric transplant outcomes remains unclear.This study investigates the effect of BMI on graft survival and patient outcomes,addressing gaps in the literature and examining disparities across BMI classifications.AIM To assess the impact of BMI classifications on graft and patient survival following KT.METHODS A retrospective cohort study analyzed 23081 pediatric transplant recipients from the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database(1987-2022).Patients were grouped into six BMI categories:Underweight,healthy weight,overweight,and Class 1,2,and 3 obesity.Data were analyzed using one-way way analysis of variance,Kruskal-Wallis tests,Chi-squared tests,Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank tests,and Cox proportional hazard regressions.Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.RESULTS Class 3 obese recipients had lower 1-year graft survival(88.7%)compared to healthy-weight recipients(93.1%,P=0.012).Underweight recipients had lower 10-year patient survival(81.3%,P<0.05)than healthy-weight recipients.Class 2 and 3 obese recipients had the lowest 5-year graft survival(67.8%and 68.3%,P=0.013)and Class 2 obesity had the lowest 10-year graft survival(40.7%).Cox regression identified increases in BMI category as an independent predictor of graft failure[hazard ratio(HR)=1.091,P<0.001]and mortality(HR=1.079,P=0.008).Obese patients experienced longer cold ischemia times(11.6 and 13.1 hours vs 10.2 hours,P<0.001).Class 3 obesity had the highest proportion of Black recipients(26.2%vs 17.9%,P<0.001).CONCLUSION Severe obesity and underweight status are associated with poorer long-term outcomes in pediatric KT recipients,emphasizing the need for nuanced transplant eligibility criteria addressing obesity-related risks and socioeconomic disparities.
文摘Non-descriptive and convenient labels are uninformative and unfairly project blame onto patients.The language clinicians use in the Electronic Medical Record,research,and clinical settings shapes biases and subsequent behaviors of all providers involved in the enterprise of transplantation.Terminology such as noncompliant and nonadherent serve as a reason for waitlist inactivation and limit access to life-saving transplantation.These labels fail to capture all the circum-stances surrounding a patient’s inability to follow their care regimen,trivialize social determinants of health variables,and bring unsubstantiated subjectivity into decisions regarding organ allocation.Furthermore,insufficient Medicare coverage has forced patients to ration or stop taking medication,leading to allograft failure and their subsequent diagnosis of noncompliant.We argue that perpetuating non-descriptive language adds little substantive information,in-creases subjectivity to the organ allocation process,and plays a major role in reduced access to transplantation.For patients with existing barriers to care,such as racial/ethnic minorities,these effects may be even more drastic.Transplant committees must ensure thorough documentation to correctly encapsulate the entirety of a patient’s position and give voice to an already vulnerable population.
