Background and Aims:Regular exercise is fundamental for people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease(MASLD),yet exercise maintenance is generally poor.This generative co-design process aimed to...Background and Aims:Regular exercise is fundamental for people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease(MASLD),yet exercise maintenance is generally poor.This generative co-design process aimed to embed the voices and opinions of people with lived experience of MASLD and their care stakeholders to(i)frame barriers and enablers to exercise maintenance and(ii)highlight priorities for exercise-focused research agendas in MASLD.Methods:A generative co-design framework was applied.Two virtual co-design sessions were undertaken:Session 1–Framing the issue,where initial discovery was conducted with people with lived experience of MASLD;and Session 2–Generative design and sharing ideas with lived experience partners and healthcare stakeholders.Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed,and key determinants and considerations were discerned by two independent researchers.Results:Lived experience partners(n=5,53±16 years,40%male)ranked five equally important barriers to exercise maintenance:musculoskeletal and pain issues,lack of access to exercise equipment/facilities,cost,competing priorities,and low energy levels,which influenced core positive and negative determinants.Alongside lived experience partners,healthcare stakeholders(hepatologists[n=3],exercise professionals[n=3],67%male)identified three core needs with eight considerations.Some disconnects in priorities were observed.Lived experience partners emphasized affordability,accessibility,and considerations for comorbidities,while healthcare partners advocated for research on natural history,prevention,behavior change,cost-effectiveness,and health system change.Conclusions:This co-design methodology highlights unique consumer-informed research questions.Exercise interventions and their associated implementation trials will benefit from being co-designed with both people with MASLD and care stakeholders.展开更多
基金supported by a Health Translation Queensland Consumer and Community Involvement Microgrant and a School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences,The University of Queensland,Small Research Grant.
文摘Background and Aims:Regular exercise is fundamental for people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease(MASLD),yet exercise maintenance is generally poor.This generative co-design process aimed to embed the voices and opinions of people with lived experience of MASLD and their care stakeholders to(i)frame barriers and enablers to exercise maintenance and(ii)highlight priorities for exercise-focused research agendas in MASLD.Methods:A generative co-design framework was applied.Two virtual co-design sessions were undertaken:Session 1–Framing the issue,where initial discovery was conducted with people with lived experience of MASLD;and Session 2–Generative design and sharing ideas with lived experience partners and healthcare stakeholders.Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed,and key determinants and considerations were discerned by two independent researchers.Results:Lived experience partners(n=5,53±16 years,40%male)ranked five equally important barriers to exercise maintenance:musculoskeletal and pain issues,lack of access to exercise equipment/facilities,cost,competing priorities,and low energy levels,which influenced core positive and negative determinants.Alongside lived experience partners,healthcare stakeholders(hepatologists[n=3],exercise professionals[n=3],67%male)identified three core needs with eight considerations.Some disconnects in priorities were observed.Lived experience partners emphasized affordability,accessibility,and considerations for comorbidities,while healthcare partners advocated for research on natural history,prevention,behavior change,cost-effectiveness,and health system change.Conclusions:This co-design methodology highlights unique consumer-informed research questions.Exercise interventions and their associated implementation trials will benefit from being co-designed with both people with MASLD and care stakeholders.
