BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)stands as an accurate imaging modality for esophageal cancer staging,however utilization of EUS in early-stage cancer management remains controversial.Identification of non-applica...BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)stands as an accurate imaging modality for esophageal cancer staging,however utilization of EUS in early-stage cancer management remains controversial.Identification of non-applicability of endoscopic interventions with deep muscular invasion with EUS in pre-intervention evaluation of early-stage esophageal cancer is compared to endoscopic and histologic indicators.AIM To display the role of EUS in pre-intervention early esophageal cancer staging and how the index endoscopic features of invasive esophageal malignancy compare for prediction of depth of invasion and cancer management.METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent pre-resection EUS after a diagnosis of esophageal cancer at a tertiary medical center from 2012 to 2022.Patient clinical data,initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy/biopsy,EUS,and final resection pathology reports were abstracted,and statistical analysis was conducted to assess the role of EUS in management decisions.RESULTS Forty nine patients were identified for this study.EUS T stage was concordant with histological T stage in 75.5%of patients.In determining submucosal involvement(T1a vs T1b),EUS had a specificity of 85.0%,sensitivity of 53.9%,and accuracy of 72.7%.Endoscopic features of tumor size>2 cm and the presence of esophageal ulceration were significantly associated with deep invasion of cancer on histology.EUS affected management from endoscopic mucosal resection/submucosal dissection to esophagectomy in 23.5%of patients without esophageal ulceration and 6.9%of patients with tumor size<2 cm.In patients without both endoscopic findings,EUS identified deeper cancer and changed management in 4.8%(1/20)of cases.CONCLUSION EUS was reasonably specific in ruling out submucosal invasion but had relatively poor sensitivity.Data validated endoscopic indicators suggested superficial cancers in the group with a tumor size<2 cm and the lack of esophageal ulceration.In patients with these findings,EUS rarely identified a deep cancer that warranted a change in management.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)stands as an accurate imaging modality for esophageal cancer staging,however utilization of EUS in early-stage cancer management remains controversial.Identification of non-applicability of endoscopic interventions with deep muscular invasion with EUS in pre-intervention evaluation of early-stage esophageal cancer is compared to endoscopic and histologic indicators.AIM To display the role of EUS in pre-intervention early esophageal cancer staging and how the index endoscopic features of invasive esophageal malignancy compare for prediction of depth of invasion and cancer management.METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent pre-resection EUS after a diagnosis of esophageal cancer at a tertiary medical center from 2012 to 2022.Patient clinical data,initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy/biopsy,EUS,and final resection pathology reports were abstracted,and statistical analysis was conducted to assess the role of EUS in management decisions.RESULTS Forty nine patients were identified for this study.EUS T stage was concordant with histological T stage in 75.5%of patients.In determining submucosal involvement(T1a vs T1b),EUS had a specificity of 85.0%,sensitivity of 53.9%,and accuracy of 72.7%.Endoscopic features of tumor size>2 cm and the presence of esophageal ulceration were significantly associated with deep invasion of cancer on histology.EUS affected management from endoscopic mucosal resection/submucosal dissection to esophagectomy in 23.5%of patients without esophageal ulceration and 6.9%of patients with tumor size<2 cm.In patients without both endoscopic findings,EUS identified deeper cancer and changed management in 4.8%(1/20)of cases.CONCLUSION EUS was reasonably specific in ruling out submucosal invasion but had relatively poor sensitivity.Data validated endoscopic indicators suggested superficial cancers in the group with a tumor size<2 cm and the lack of esophageal ulceration.In patients with these findings,EUS rarely identified a deep cancer that warranted a change in management.
