BACKGROUND The rising incidence of laryngeal cancer has led to an increasing number of total laryngectomy procedures.While voice prostheses have significantly improved post-laryngectomy rehabilitation,the risk of sali...BACKGROUND The rising incidence of laryngeal cancer has led to an increasing number of total laryngectomy procedures.While voice prostheses have significantly improved post-laryngectomy rehabilitation,the risk of salivary fistula remains a major complication.This study aims to compare the stapler and hand-sewn techniques for esophageal closure and evaluate their impact on fistula formation.AIM To compare stapler-assisted and hand-sewn esophageal closure techniques after laryngectomy regarding their impact on salivary fistula formation.METHODS A total of 52 patients(44 men,8 women),aged 43 to 77 years,underwent total laryngectomy.Esophageal reconstruction was performed using either a stapler(29 patients)or a hand-sewn technique(23 patients).A surgical stapler TA was used for esophageal closure in the stapler group.Patients were clinically monitored for fistula formation during the first 7 days postoperatively and again two weeks after discharge using fiberoptic examination.RESULTS A total of 22 salivary fistulas were recorded:17(77.3%)occurred following the hand-sewn technique,while 5(22.7%)developed in the stapler group.Addi-tionally,preoperative radiotherapy was identified as a statistically significant risk factor for fistula formation.No technical complications related to the stapler device were observed.CONCLUSION Although hand-sewn closure is commonly used after total laryngectomy,stapler-assisted closure shows lower fistula rates and is a viable esophageal reconstruction alternative.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND The rising incidence of laryngeal cancer has led to an increasing number of total laryngectomy procedures.While voice prostheses have significantly improved post-laryngectomy rehabilitation,the risk of salivary fistula remains a major complication.This study aims to compare the stapler and hand-sewn techniques for esophageal closure and evaluate their impact on fistula formation.AIM To compare stapler-assisted and hand-sewn esophageal closure techniques after laryngectomy regarding their impact on salivary fistula formation.METHODS A total of 52 patients(44 men,8 women),aged 43 to 77 years,underwent total laryngectomy.Esophageal reconstruction was performed using either a stapler(29 patients)or a hand-sewn technique(23 patients).A surgical stapler TA was used for esophageal closure in the stapler group.Patients were clinically monitored for fistula formation during the first 7 days postoperatively and again two weeks after discharge using fiberoptic examination.RESULTS A total of 22 salivary fistulas were recorded:17(77.3%)occurred following the hand-sewn technique,while 5(22.7%)developed in the stapler group.Addi-tionally,preoperative radiotherapy was identified as a statistically significant risk factor for fistula formation.No technical complications related to the stapler device were observed.CONCLUSION Although hand-sewn closure is commonly used after total laryngectomy,stapler-assisted closure shows lower fistula rates and is a viable esophageal reconstruction alternative.
