Background:Benign essential blepharospasm(BEB),aberrant facial nerve degeneration and hemifacial spasm(HFS)are all examples dystonia which,though not life-threatening,can have a significant impact on patient quality o...Background:Benign essential blepharospasm(BEB),aberrant facial nerve degeneration and hemifacial spasm(HFS)are all examples dystonia which,though not life-threatening,can have a significant impact on patient quality of life.The need for reliable self-rating surveys to monitor functional disability is fundamental.The Blepharospasm Disability Index(BSDI)is already a widely utilised and validated selfrating score for blepharospasm whilst the functional disability score(FDS)requires further validation.The principle aim of this study is to repeat validation of the FDS against the BSDI,which has been validated by several groups since its original description but only in patients with BEB.Methods:A randomised blinded prospective cohort study was conducted at a single unit on 38 patients with BEB,aberrant facial nerve degeneration and HFS.Patients were blinded to complete the FDS followed by the BSDI or the BSDI followed by the FDS with a 30-minute interval.Results:Both the FDS and BSDI were found to be reliable with high internal consistency and test-retest reliability.Both scales were also found to be moderately correlated with the Jankovic disease severity score.Conclusions:This study is the first to use the FDS as a rating scale in patients with HFS and aberrant facial nerve degeneration.It is also the first study to formally validate the FDS as an acceptable rating scale for patients with dystonia and in particular it provides validation for its use in patients with HFS and aberrant facial nerve degeneration.展开更多
文摘Background:Benign essential blepharospasm(BEB),aberrant facial nerve degeneration and hemifacial spasm(HFS)are all examples dystonia which,though not life-threatening,can have a significant impact on patient quality of life.The need for reliable self-rating surveys to monitor functional disability is fundamental.The Blepharospasm Disability Index(BSDI)is already a widely utilised and validated selfrating score for blepharospasm whilst the functional disability score(FDS)requires further validation.The principle aim of this study is to repeat validation of the FDS against the BSDI,which has been validated by several groups since its original description but only in patients with BEB.Methods:A randomised blinded prospective cohort study was conducted at a single unit on 38 patients with BEB,aberrant facial nerve degeneration and HFS.Patients were blinded to complete the FDS followed by the BSDI or the BSDI followed by the FDS with a 30-minute interval.Results:Both the FDS and BSDI were found to be reliable with high internal consistency and test-retest reliability.Both scales were also found to be moderately correlated with the Jankovic disease severity score.Conclusions:This study is the first to use the FDS as a rating scale in patients with HFS and aberrant facial nerve degeneration.It is also the first study to formally validate the FDS as an acceptable rating scale for patients with dystonia and in particular it provides validation for its use in patients with HFS and aberrant facial nerve degeneration.
