盾构选型的合理性和关键参数的准确确定是盾构法工程施工成败的关键。针对成都地铁7号线火车南站至神仙树区间地质和水文特征,结合盾构对不同地层的适应性比较,论证采用土压平衡盾构施工的可行性和必要性。同时就盾构施工可能出现的问题...盾构选型的合理性和关键参数的准确确定是盾构法工程施工成败的关键。针对成都地铁7号线火车南站至神仙树区间地质和水文特征,结合盾构对不同地层的适应性比较,论证采用土压平衡盾构施工的可行性和必要性。同时就盾构施工可能出现的问题,对盾构各个系统进行选型分析。在盾构推进阻力和刀盘回转阻力计算方法基础上,结合实际的地质参数,计算出该区间内最大的推进阻力为10 659 k N,最大刀盘回转阻力矩为4 072 k N·m;选取合适的储备系数,确定盾构最大推力和刀盘装备扭矩的建议值分别为26 648 k N和6 108 k N·m。最后通过与实际值进行对比,验证了盾构推力和刀盘驱动扭矩理论选型值的准确性。展开更多
Objective To compare differences in therapeutic effects between acupuncture accelerating qi-flow along meridians （AQF） and conventional acupuncture （CA） in treating periarthritis of shoulder to find better acupunc...Objective To compare differences in therapeutic effects between acupuncture accelerating qi-flow along meridians （AQF） and conventional acupuncture （CA） in treating periarthritis of shoulder to find better acupuncture methods. Methods Sixty-four patients were randomly divided into two groups： group AQF, and group CA with 32 cases in each group. Jiānyú （肩髃 LI 15）, Jiānliáo （肩髎 TE 14）, Jiānzhēn （肩贞 SI 9）, Bìnào （臂臑 LI 14）, Qūchí （曲池 LI 11） and Wàiguān （外关 TE 5） on the affected side were used in both groups, and the two acupuncture methods were respectively used in the two groups for consecutive 2 courses. Pain and moving functions of shoulder and ability in daily life （ADL） were used as indices for evaluating therapeutic effects. Results The total effective rate was 96.9% （31/32） and 81.3% （26/32） in group AQF and group CA, respectively, showing superiority of AQF to CA （P〈0.05）. Scores reflecting pain and moving functions of shoulder and ADL were all improved after treatment in both groups （all P〈0.05）, and the improvement in group AQF was more obvious than those in group CA （all P〈0.05）. Conclusion In treating periarthritis of shoulder, the acupuncture accelerating qi-flow along meridians was better than conventional acupuncture in alleviating pain of the shoulder, improving its moving function and elevating abilities in daily life.展开更多
文摘盾构选型的合理性和关键参数的准确确定是盾构法工程施工成败的关键。针对成都地铁7号线火车南站至神仙树区间地质和水文特征,结合盾构对不同地层的适应性比较,论证采用土压平衡盾构施工的可行性和必要性。同时就盾构施工可能出现的问题,对盾构各个系统进行选型分析。在盾构推进阻力和刀盘回转阻力计算方法基础上,结合实际的地质参数,计算出该区间内最大的推进阻力为10 659 k N,最大刀盘回转阻力矩为4 072 k N·m;选取合适的储备系数,确定盾构最大推力和刀盘装备扭矩的建议值分别为26 648 k N和6 108 k N·m。最后通过与实际值进行对比,验证了盾构推力和刀盘驱动扭矩理论选型值的准确性。
文摘Objective To compare differences in therapeutic effects between acupuncture accelerating qi-flow along meridians （AQF） and conventional acupuncture （CA） in treating periarthritis of shoulder to find better acupuncture methods. Methods Sixty-four patients were randomly divided into two groups： group AQF, and group CA with 32 cases in each group. Jiānyú （肩髃 LI 15）, Jiānliáo （肩髎 TE 14）, Jiānzhēn （肩贞 SI 9）, Bìnào （臂臑 LI 14）, Qūchí （曲池 LI 11） and Wàiguān （外关 TE 5） on the affected side were used in both groups, and the two acupuncture methods were respectively used in the two groups for consecutive 2 courses. Pain and moving functions of shoulder and ability in daily life （ADL） were used as indices for evaluating therapeutic effects. Results The total effective rate was 96.9% （31/32） and 81.3% （26/32） in group AQF and group CA, respectively, showing superiority of AQF to CA （P〈0.05）. Scores reflecting pain and moving functions of shoulder and ADL were all improved after treatment in both groups （all P〈0.05）, and the improvement in group AQF was more obvious than those in group CA （all P〈0.05）. Conclusion In treating periarthritis of shoulder, the acupuncture accelerating qi-flow along meridians was better than conventional acupuncture in alleviating pain of the shoulder, improving its moving function and elevating abilities in daily life.
