期刊文献+

吻合器治疗重度痔(60例报告) 被引量:74

The efficacy of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids (A Report of 60 Cases)
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨吻合器痔环状切除 (PPH)的适应证、方法和疗效。 方法 经肛门镜下采用 33mm吻合器切除重度内痔患者 6 0例 ,分析经PPH治疗的临床资料。 结果 平均手术时间 9分钟 ,术后平均住院 2 5天 ,8例 (13 3% )术后第 1~ 7天有便血 ,经保守治疗后好转。 2 4例术后当天无肛门疼痛。随访 1~ 7月效果良好。 结论 PPH治疗重度痔是一种新技术 ,具有安全、有效、手术时间短、住院时间少、恢复快等优点。 Ojective To evalute the efficacy of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in the treatment of patients with severe hemorrhoids (grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ°) Methods 60 cases of hemorrhoids at the third or fourth degree were operated on by PPH. Results The mean operation time was 9 minutes and mean hospitalization time was 2.5 days. Postoperative bleeding was noted in 8 cases (13.3%) at the 1 st and 7 th day after operation, which was cured by conservative methods. 24 patients had no annal spasm following the procedure. Follow-up period lasting for 1-7 months showed no complications Conclusions PPH is a safe and effective treatment for hemorrhoids at the third or fourth degree with the advantages of shorter hsopitaliztion time and quicker recovery.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2001年第5期268-269,共2页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 吻合器 重度痔 吻合器痔环状切除术 适应证 肛门镜 procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH) hemorrhoids
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1何道钰,黄茜.注射疗法在肛肠疾病中的应用[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2000,20(5):34-36. 被引量:20
  • 2张诚龙,牛伟新,姚礼庆,秦新裕.硬化剂注射疗法治疗内痔对肛管压力的影响[J].中国内镜杂志,1997,3(6):1-2. 被引量:8
  • 3Murie JA, Sim AJM, Mackenzie I. Rubberband ligation versus haemorrhoidectomy forprolapsing haemorrhoids: a long term prospective clinical trial. Br J Surg, 1982,69:536-38.
  • 4Corno F, Muratore A, Mistrangelo M. complications of the surgical treatment ofhemorrhoids and its therapy. Ann Ital Chir, 1995, 66:813-6.
  • 5Thompon WHF. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg, 1975, 62:542-52.
  • 6Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa andhaemorrhoidal prolase with a circular stapling device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the6th World congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Rome. Italy. june 3-6, 1998.
  • 7Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versusMilligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomsed controlled trial. Lancet, 2000, 355:782-785.
  • 8Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway Dm. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapledhaemorrhoidectomy) versus convevtional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.Lancet, 2000, 355:779-781.

共引文献21

同被引文献284

引证文献74

二级引证文献337

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部