期刊文献+

模糊聚类分析在耀斑-地磁扰动研究中的初步应用 被引量:4

PRELIMINARY APPLICATION OF FUZZY CLUSTERING IN THE FLARE-GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCE ANALYSES
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文运用模糊聚类分析的方法,对1975—1983年可证认出的210个耀斑-IPS激波事件进行了分析研究,给出了它们的聚类指标和模糊等价关系以及大、中、小三类耀斑-磁扰的聚类中心。初步研究结果表明:95%的耀斑-IPS激波会引起地磁扰动(∑Kp≥16);对持续1小时以上的二级耀斑和2小时以上的一级耀斑,以及多个射电源的IPS观测均出现50km/8以上的速度跳跃这类大耀斑-IPS激波事件进行模糊聚类磁扰强弱预报试验,其准确率可达80%;这种大耀斑-IPS激波事件所对应的地磁扰动变化范围很宽,从∑Kp≥12直到∑Kp≤54,这说明耀斑-激波在行星际空间的传播以及向地球的传输过程是十分复杂的。 The method of fuzzy clustering is used to study 210 geomagnetic disturbance events,which were caused by the flare associated interplanetary shock waves during the period of 1975-1983.Clustering centers,fuzzy equivalent relationships and clustering indices for three kinds of clusers (i.e.large,middle and small) are obtained.Main results are: (1) for 95 % of all flare-shock waves could cause the geomagnetic disturbances (∑Kp≥16);(2) success to failure ratio of the fuzzy-clustering prediction test is about 80% for the large geomagnetic disturbance events,which were caused by those flares with importance ≥2,lasting over hour and importance≥1,lasting over 2 hours and for those where a sudden velocity increase in the solar wind,exceeding 50km/s,were observed with at least 3 radio sources;and (3) for these large events,the variation range of the geomagnetic disturbances is very wide,from ∑Kp≥12 to ∑Kp≤54,showing that the geomagnetic effects associated with the flare-interplanetary shock waves are very complicated.
出处 《空间科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1992年第1期50-56,共7页 Chinese Journal of Space Science
基金 国家自然科学基金
关键词 模糊聚类 聚类标指 耀斑 地磁 Fuzzy clustering,Clustering indices,Fuzzy equivalent relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1魏奉思,空间科学学报,1990年,10卷,35页
  • 2魏奉思,地球物理学报,1984年,27卷,417页
  • 3冯德益,模糊数学方法与应用,1983年
  • 4魏奉思,空间科学学报,1982年,2卷,63页

同被引文献85

  • 1ZHAO Xinhua,FENG Xueshang.A tentative study for the prediction of the CME related geomagnetic storm intensity and its transit time[J].Science China(Technological Sciences),2005,48(6):648-668. 被引量:4
  • 2章公亮.行星际高密度结构的磁流体动力学特性[J].中国科学(A辑),1989,20(5):502-508. 被引量:1
  • 31,The National Space Weather Program——The Strategic Plan, Aug 1995. Federal Coordination for Meteorology, Washington D C, Mar 1995
  • 4Kamide Y, Mcpherron R L, Gonzalez W D, et al. Magnetic storms: current understanding and outstanding questions. In:Tsurutani B T, Gonzalez W D, Kamide Y, et al, eds. Geophysical Monograph 98, Washington D C: American Geophysical Union, 1997. 1-19.
  • 5Joselyn J A. Geomagnetic activity forecasting: the state of the art. Reviews of Geophysics, 1995, 33:383-401.
  • 6Gapper G R, Hewish A, Purvis A, et al. Observing interplanetary disturbances from the ground. Nature, 1982, 296:633-636.
  • 7Kojima M, Kakinuma T J. Solar cycle evolution of solar wind speed structure between 1973 and 1985 observed with the interplanetary scintillation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1987, 92:7269-7279.
  • 8Wei F S, Yang G, Zhang G. Three-dimensional propagation properties of flare-associated interplanetary shock waves from interplanetary scintillation observations. In: Cornelis de Jager, Chen B, eds. Proceedings of Kunming Workshop on Solar Physics and Interplanetary Travelling Phenomena Ⅱ, Beijing: Science Press, 1985. 1043-1051.
  • 9Wei F S, Dryer M. Propagation of solar flare-associated interplanetary shock waves in the heliospheric merididonal plane.Solar Physics, 1991, 132:373-394.
  • 10章公亮.简单强磁云的结构特征[J]空间科学学报,1988(04).

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部