摘要
目的:研究旨在对比分析2018-2023年国内外体育运动与心理健康领域的研究热点、方法学特征及影响力差异,揭示运动促进心理健康的学科规律与跨文化实践路径,为优化学科布局与健康政策制定提供依据。方法:采用文献计量与内容分析法,整合中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science(WOS)核心文献数据,系统解析运动干预心理健康的研究主题分布、方法论创新及成果转化效能,并结合政策文本与临床案例进行质性探讨。结果:体育运动与心理健康研究呈现“个体行为-社会生态”双向互动特征。国内研究聚焦全民健康政策下的实践创新,包括儿童青少年执行功能促进、数字社区运动处方及体医融合政策落地;国际研究强调运动干预临床转化与弱势群体包容性康复。研究方法上,国内以量化研究为主,国外多采用混合方法。影响力方面,国内形成政策驱动的垂直应用链,国际研究渗透至公共健康、教育公平等多元领域。国内外差异源于健康治理目标与学科定位的分野:国内侧重政策牵引的系统实践,国际注重学科交叉的社会价值外溢。未来需以锻炼心理学为核心,推动跨学科协同与技术融合:开发低成本数字健康工具,完善体医融合政策体系,设计文化响应型运动干预方案,构建起面向全民的“普惠健康基建”,助力全球健康公平目标的实现。
Objective:This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of research hotspots,methodological characteristics,and academic impact disparities in the field of sports and mental health between domestic and international scholarship from 2018 to 2023.It seeks to uncover disciplinary patterns and cross-cultural pathways for sports-driven mental health promotion,thereby informing the optimization of disciplinary frameworks and health policy formulation.Methods:Using bibliometric and content analysis,this research integrates core literature from CNKI and Web of Science(WOS)databases.It systematically examines thematic distributions,methodological innovations,and knowledge translation efficiency in sports-based mental health interventions.Qualitative explorations incorporating policy texts and clinical case studies further enrich the analytical framework.Results:The findings reveal a bidirectional interaction between individual behavior and socio-ecological factors in sports and mental health research.Domestic studies prioritize policy-driven practical innovations under China's National Health Strategy,including executive function enhancement in children/adolescents,digital community-based exercise prescriptions,and implementation of sports-medicine integration policies.International research emphasizes clinical translation of exercise interventions and inclusive rehabilitation for vulnerable populations.Methodologically,quantitative approaches dominate domestic scholarship,while international studies predominantly adopt mixed-methods designs.Regarding academic impact,Chinese research demonstrates vertically integrated policy application chains,whereas global scholarship permeates diverse fields such as public health and educational equity.These disparities stem from divergent health governance objectives and disciplinary orientations:China emphasizes policy-anchored systemic implementation,while international scholarship focuses on interdisciplinary social value spillovers.Conclusion:Future advancements should center on exercise psychology to foster interdisciplinary collaboration and technological integration.Key priorities include developing low-cost digital health tools,refining sports-medicine policy systems,and designing culturally responsive exercise interventions.Such efforts will facilitate a paradigm shift from"athletic performance optimization"to"equitable health infrastructure,"ultimately advancing global health equity objectives.
作者
娄虎
张乔乔
LOU Hu;ZHANG Qiao-qiao(School of Sports Science,Nantong University,Nantong 226019,China)
出处
《浙江体育科学》
2026年第1期66-75,92,共11页
Zhejiang Sport Science
基金
国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题(BLA210215)
2025年度江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目(2025SJYB1247)。
关键词
体育运动
心理健康
研究热点
运动处方
体医融合
Sports
Mental health
Research hotspots
Exercise prescriptions
Sports-medicine integration
