摘要
本文基于标准源法与标准表法在校准中的技术特性及适用场景,探索计量效能与经济性协同优化的实现路径。同时,通过构建一种双体系校准平台,验证两者的测量重复性、不确定度及操作效率,并对功率进行不确定度评定,从而为实验室资源配置与校准模式选择提供量化依据。结果表明:标准源法效率和设备成本较高,适用于自动化校准(如高精度批量校准);标准表法在复杂环境中灵活性较强,硬件投入较低,但人工操作耗时较长,适用于特殊工况或研发验证场景。
This paper explores the path to achieving a synergistic optimization of metrological performance and cost-effectiveness by examining the technical characteristics and applicable scenarios of the standard source method and the standard meter method in calibration.Additionally,by constructing a dual-system calibration platform,it verifies the measurement repeatability,uncertainty,and operational efficiency of both methods,along with conducting uncertainty evaluation for power.This provides a quantitative basis for laboratory resource allocation and calibration mode selection.The results indicate that the standard source method is more efficient and has higher equipment costs,making it suitable for automated calibration(e.g.,high-precision batch calibration).In contrast,the standard meter method demonstrates greater flexibility in complex environments with lower hardware investment but requires more manual operation time,making it appropriate for special working conditions or R&D verification scenarios.
作者
吕亮
李世光
LV Liang;LI Shiguang
出处
《计量与测试技术》
2025年第12期101-103,共3页
Metrology & Measurement Technique
关键词
标准源法
标准表法
测量不确定度
计量效能与经济性
standard source method
standard table method
measurement uncertainty
Measurement efficiency and economy
