摘要
法域冲突难题的破解宜采用缓和的违法一元论。在刑事违法性相对判断的标准上,“可罚的违法性说”不符合我国“定性加定量”的立法模式,且判断标准不明。而与“法益说”相比,“规范保护目的说”更宜作为具体判断标准。对于前置法认为合法的行为,排除其一般违法性,当然不具有刑事违法性。对于前置法认定为违法的行为,在肯定其一般违法性的基础上,根据“规范保护目的说”:在刑法与前置法的规范保护目的一致时,刑事违法性从属于前置法;在刑法与前置法的规范保护目的不一致时,刑事违法性独立于前置法。
The solution to the problem of jurisdictional conflict is to adopt a moderate monism of illegality.In terms of the criteria for judging criminal illegality,the“punishable illegality theory”is not in line with China’s“qualitative plus quantitative”legislative model,and the judgment standard is also unclear.Compared with the“legal benefit theory”,the“normative protection purpose theory”is more appropriate as a specific judgment standard.For the acts considered legal by the preceding law,the general illegality is excluded,and of course,there is no criminal illegality.For the acts that are considered illegal by the preceding law,on the basis of affirming their general illegality,according to the“normative protection purpose”,criminal illegality is subordinate to the preceding law when the criminal law is consistent with the normative protection purpose of the preceding law;when the criminal law is inconsistent with the normative protection purpose of the preceding law,criminal illegality is independent of the preceding law.
作者
赵天红
施杰阳
Zhao Tianhong;Shi Jieyang
出处
《刑法论丛》
2023年第1期275-298,共24页
Criminal Law Review
基金
2019年度国家社科基金一般项目“互联网金融时代非法集资犯罪认定研究”(BFX070)的阶段性成果
关键词
法秩序统一原理
缓和的违法一元论
规范保护目的
刑事违法性
unity of legal order principle
moderate monism of the illegality
normative protection purpose
criminal illegality
