摘要
凡·埃默伦认为,论辩理论集描述性与规范性于一体,糅合多学科乃至跨学科的研究方法,因而构成了一个混杂性学科。现代论辩学家或借助于侧重论辩合理性的辩证,或借助于关注论辩有效性的修辞,为论辩这一学科注入了新内涵。而要把握上述两个视角,则应参照亚里士多德的相关看法。用亚氏的话说,二者是两种"对应的艺术"。然而,它们的这一关系却未能在现代论辩理论中得到沿承。考虑到这一点关乎论辩理论能否完备周延,埃默伦借助"机变"概念对"语用-辩证"学说进行了拓展,从而重新确立了辩证与修辞作为两种"对应艺术"的关系。
According to van Eemeren,argumentation theory is a hybrid discipline,because it requires a multidisciplinary,if not interdisciplinary approach,combining descriptive and normative insights. He points out that modern argumentation theorists give substance to the discipline by relying either on a dialectical perspective,concentrating on the reasonableness of argumentation, or on a rhetorical perspective, concentrating on its effectiveness. Both the dialectical and the rhetorical perspective are interpreted in ways related to how they were viewed by Aristotle,but in modern argumentation theory the relationship between the two,captured in Aristotle’s term antistrophos,is lost. According to van Eemeren,this relationship,which he considers crucial to a full-fledged argumentation theory,has been recovered in extended pragma-dialectics with the help of the theoretical notion of‘strategic manoeuvring’.
出处
《当代修辞学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期36-51,共16页
Contemporary Rhetoric
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“修辞人格理论观照下的语用身份研究”(项目编号:300102130642)的资助。
