摘要
汤用彤《王弼圣人有情义释》对何晏王弼二论作了深入探讨,但其内涵和逻辑有所未尽。何晏之论重心在"情之有无",而王弼的关切却首先在"应物与否"、兼而回应圣人有情将如何能保证不累于物的挑战,二人不构成直接争论。何晏无情论的思路本自庄子,属"不滞于情"之义;而王弼回应挑战而谈到的有情论,依据"任情自然",实质也属庄学。何王之别只是字面差异而无实质分歧,两人均认可自然情感、而否认心识推动的情感。
In the article of the Interpretation of Wang Bi’s Theory about Sage’s Emotion,Tang Yong-tong has made an in-depth discussion on He Yan and Wang Bi.But there is still space worth discussing in meaning and logic of the theory.Actually,He Yan focused on arguing whether the sage has emotion or not,while Wang Bi initially on arguing whether the sage reacts to objects or not and then on answering how can the sage has no ensnarement when being affectionate.There is no direct argument between them.The logic of He Yan’s theory originates from Zhuangzi,meaning no sticking in emotion.And Wang Bi’s answer bases on the idea of letting emotion go naturally,virtually the same belonging to Zhuangzi.He Yan and Wang Bi essentially share the same idea on the sage’s emotion,admitting the natural emotion,and denying the emotion by planning.
出处
《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期134-142,159,共10页
Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
关键词
圣人有情无情
王弼
不滞
任情
自然
whether the sage has emotion or not
Wang Bi
nosticking in emotion
let emotion go naturally
being natural
