摘要
目的研究分析肛瘘根治术患者临床中接受护理干预的效果。方法根据我院2012年7月—2013年7月接收的60例肛瘘患者来进行研究分析,全部患者均能够接受麻醉和手术治疗,将这些患者进行了分组,对照组和观察组均有30例,对照组患者术后接受了常规护理方式,观察组患者接受了护理干预措施,对两组患者初次下床活动情况,排气时间,尿管留置时间等进行了对比分析。结果观察组患者初次下床活动时间、排气时间、切口愈合时间等指标均要比对照组优秀,早于对照组,观察组平均住院时间(19.2±4.7)天,对照组平均住院时间(26.1±3.2)天,观察组患者的尿管留置时间和住院时间比对照组短,结果对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肛瘘根治术患者临床中接受护理干预的效果十分突出,患者术后康复效果好,并发症发生率低,患者的排气时间和术后下床时间均比较短。
Objective To study the curative effect of anal fistula received nursing intervention in clinical patients. Methods According to 60 cases of anal fistula in our hospital from July 2012 to July 2013 to carry on the research analysis, all patients were able to accept the anesthesia and surgery, these patients were devided into two groups, control group and observation group, 30 cases in each group. The control group patients received routine nursing care, patients in the observation group received nursing intervention measures of two groups of patients first ambulation, exhaust time, catheter indwelling time were analyzed. Results Patients in the observation group were significantly better than the control group in the time of first ambulation, exhaust time, wound healing time, earlier than control group. The average hospitalization time of the observation group （19.2±4.7） days, the control group the average hospitalization time （26.1±3.2） days, the observation group of patients with indwelling catheter time and hosp.italization time shorter than the control group. There were significant differences （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The clinical curative surgery in patients with anal fistula received nursing intervention effect is very prominent, the rehabilitation effect of patients with postoperative complications were good, low exhaust time and postoperative out of bed time were relatively short.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2017年第8期249-250,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
肛瘘根治术
护理干预
护理效果
radical resection of anal fistula
nursing intervention
nursing effect
