期刊文献+

胆汁中CA19-9、CA125对胆系恶性肿瘤的临床诊断价值 被引量:2

Diagnostic value of bile levels of CA19-9 and CA125 in biliary tract carcinoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨胆汁中肿瘤标志物糖链抗原19-9(carbohydrate antigen 19-9,CA19-9)、癌抗原125(cancer antigen 125,CA125)对胆系恶性肿瘤的临床诊断价值.方法:选取胆系疾病患者共95例,根据病理结果分为恶性肿瘤、良性病变两组,术前抽取血清样本,术中抽取胆汁样本,分别测定血清及胆汁中CA19-9、CA125的水平,进行统计学分析并得出对临床诊断意义.结果:胆系恶性肿瘤组血清及胆汁中CA19-9及CA125水平均显著高于胆系良性疾病组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05).胆系良、恶性疾病组胆汁中CA19-9及CA125水平均显著高于血清水平,且差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05).胆汁CA19-9、CA125及双项联合测定的灵敏性为90.48%、83.33%和92.86%,特异性为43.40%、64.15%和72.63%,均优于血清指标(均P<0.05).结论:胆汁中CA19-9及CA125对于胆系恶性肿瘤的诊断价值高于血清指标,且二者联合测定有助于提高胆系恶性肿瘤的临床诊断. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic value of bile levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9) and cancer antigen 125(CA125) in biliary tract carcinoma. METHODS: Ninety-five patients pathologically diagnosed with either biliary tract carcinoma or benign biliary disease were included. Serum and bile samples were taken before and during operation. The levels of CAl9-9 and CA125 in serum and bile were detected, and their diagnostic value was evaluated. RESULTS: The levels of CA19-9 and CA125 in serum and bile were significantly higher in patients with biliary tract carcinoma than in those with benign biliary disease(P 0.05 for all). The levels of CA19-9 and CA125 in bile were significantly higher than those in serum in both groups of patients(P 0.05 for all). The sensitivities of CA19-9, CA125 in bile alone and their combination were 90.48%, 83.33% and 92.86%, and the specif icities were 43.40%, 64.15% and 72.63%, respectively. C O N C L U S I O N : The diagnostic value of CA19-9 and CA125 in bile is higher than that of serum CA19-9 and CA125 in biliary tract carcinoma. Combined detection of tumor makers in bile can improve the diagnosis of biliary tract carcinoma.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 2016年第1期131-135,共5页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 胆系恶性肿瘤 胆汁 糖链抗原19-9 癌抗原125 临床诊断 Biliary tract carcinoma Bile Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 Cancer antigen 125 Clinical diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Cardinale V, Semeraro R, Torrice-A, : M, Napoli C, Bragazzi MC, Gentile R, Alvaro D. Intra- hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: New insight into epidemiology and risk factors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2010; 2:407416 [PMID: 21160904 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i11.407].
  • 2Razumilava N, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 2014; 383:2168-2179 [PMID: 24581682 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61903-0].
  • 3刘昌军,彭德珍,杨尽晖,蒋波,吴金术.肿瘤标志物在肝胆管结石合并胆管癌诊断与预后评估中的价值[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2013,19(9):665-668. 被引量:15
  • 4Leelawat K, Narong S, Wannaprasert J, Ratanashu-ek T. Prospective study of MMP7 serum levels in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16:4697-4703 [PMID: 20872971 DOh 10.3748/wjg.v16.i37.4697].
  • 5Malaguarnera G, Paladina I, Giordano M, Malaguarnera M, Bertino G, Berretta M. Serum markers of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Dis Markers 2013; 34:219-228 [PMID: 23396291 DOI: 10.3233/DMA-130964].
  • 6Tsirlis T, Ausania F, White SA, French JJ, Jaques BC, Charnley RM, Manas DM. Implications of the index cholecystectomy and timing of referral for radical resection of advanced incidental gallbladder cancer. Ann R Coll 8urg Engl 2015; 97: 131-136 [PMID: 25723690 DOh 10.1308/003588414 X14055925060073].
  • 7Liu X, Cai H, Wang Y. Prognostic significance of tumour markers in Chinese patients with gastric cancer. ANZ ] Surg 2014; 84:448-453 [PMID: 23013163 DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06287.x].
  • 8Gungorduk K, Ertas IE, Ozdemir A, Akkaya E, Telli E, Taskin S, Gokcu M, Guzel AB, Oge T, Akman L, Toptas T, Solmaz U, Dogan A, Terek MC, Sanci M, Ozsaran A, Simsek T, Vardar MA, Yalcin OT, Ozalp S, Yildirim Y, Ortac F. Prognostic Significance of Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy, Preoperative Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio in Primary Fallopian Tube Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study. Cancer Res Treat 2015; 47: 480-488 [PMID: 25622588 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014. 058].
  • 9Higashi M, Yamada N, Yokoyama S, Kitamoto S, Tabata K, Koriyama C, Batra SK, Yonezawa S. Pathobiological implications of MUC16/CA125 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma- mass forming type. Pathobiology 2012; 79:101-106.[PMID: 22286058 DOI: 10.1159/000335164].
  • 10Kongpetch S, Jusakul A, Ong CK, Lim WK, Rozen SG, Tan P, Teh BT. Pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma: From genetics to signalling pathways. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 29:233-244 [PMID: 25966424 DOh 10.1016/j.bpg. 2015.02.002].

二级参考文献9

共引文献21

同被引文献11

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部