期刊文献+

股权制衡、董事长任期与投资挤占研究 被引量:36

Research on the Counterbalance Mechanism of Blockholders, Chairman Tenure and Investment Extrusion
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在委托代理理论的分析框架下,着重运用高层梯队理论,以我国2008-2012年上市公司为样本,考察了董事长既有任期、预期任期对投资挤占的影响。研究发现:董事长既有任期、预期任期与公司整体投资水平均呈显著正相关;董事长既有任期与投资挤占呈显著正相关;董事长预期任期与投资挤占呈显著负相关;股权制衡在董事长既有任期影响投资挤占中起到了缓解作用,但在董事长预期任期影响投资挤占中尚未起到调节作用。进一步区分产权性质发现,在国有和非国有公司中,不同既有任期、预期任期的董事长对各类别投资、投资挤占的影响以及股权制衡对上述关系的调节作用均存在差异。这些研究结论对于深入理解企业的投资行为,以及加强人力资源管理都具有一定的启示意义。 Based on the principal-agent theory and upper echelons theory, this paper theoretically analyzes and empirically examines whether and how chairman actual tenure and expected tenure may affect investment extrusion and whether the counterbalance mechanism of blockholders may moderate this relationship, using the data of Chinese listed companies from 2008 to 2012. Our results demonstrate that, first, chairman actual tenure and expected tenure significantly and positively affect investment. Second, the chairman actual tenure has a positive and significant effect on fixed-asset investment and intangible-assets investment, but a negative and significant effect on long-term equity investment, and a positive and significant effect on investment extrusion. Third, the chairman expected tenure has no significant effect on fixed-asset investment, a negative and significant effect on intangible-assets investment, a positive and significant effect on long-term equity investment, and a negative and significant effect on investment extrusion. Fourth, the counterbalance mechanism of blockholders positively moderates the relationship between the chairman actual tenure and invest- ment extrusion, but it doesn't moderate the relationship between the chairman expected tenure and investment extrusion. However, these relationships show significant difference between state-owned companies and non-state-owned companies, namely, the effects of chairman actual tenure on various categories of investment and investment extrusion are more significant in non-state-owned com- panies, and the moderate effect of the counterbalance mechanism of blockholders is also more significant in non-state-owned compa- nies. The effects of chairman expected tenure on various categories of investment and investment extrusion are only significant in non- state-owned companies and the moderate effect of the counterbal- ance mechanism of blockholders in state-owned and non-state- owned companies on the whole is not significant. These conclusions are helpful and significant for us to understand the corporate invest- ment decision and improve human resources management, as soon as theoretically and practically significant to the Chinese corporate with regard to deepen the property rights reform.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期54-69,共16页 Nankai Business Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71202110) 教育部人文社会科学项目(11YJC630142)资助
关键词 股权制衡 既有任期 预期任期 投资挤占 产权性质 Counterbalance Mechanism of Blockholders Actual Tenure Expected Tenure Investment Extrusion Property Rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献71

  • 1Hackbarth, D.. Managerial Traits and Capital Structure Deci- sions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2008, 43(04): 843-882.
  • 2Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H.. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.
  • 3Myers, S. C., Majluf, N. S.. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics, 1984, 13(2): 187-221.
  • 4Narayanan, M. P.. Managerial Incentives for Short-term Results. The Journal of Finance, 1985, 40(5): 1469-1484.
  • 5Jensen, M. C.. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Fi- nance, and Takeovers. The American Economic Review, 1986, 76(2): 323-329.
  • 6Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W.. Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager-specific Investments. Journal of Financial Eco- nomics, 1989, 25(1): 123-139.
  • 7Heaton, J. B.. Managerial Optimism and Corporate Finance. Fi- nancial Management, 2002, 31(2): 33-45.
  • 8Malmendier, U., Tate, G.. CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment. The Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(6): 2661-2700.
  • 9Lin, Y. H., Hu, S. Y.,Chen, M. S.. Managerial Optimism and Corporate Investment: Some Empirical Evidence from Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2005, 13(5): 523-546.
  • 10Barberis, N., Thaler, R.. A Survey of Behavioral Finance. Hand- book of the Economics of Finance, 2003, (1): 1051-1121.

二级参考文献816

共引文献5818

同被引文献615

引证文献36

二级引证文献552

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部